View Single Post
Old 27 November 2014, 04:47 PM   #66
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLRdude View Post
I have no problem with paying that for a high end Quartz, as I believe there is room for a HAQ in any collection.

Personally, while I am a HUGE Grand Seiko fan, I just couldn't do those models, for reasons that others might not share with me.

One... I absolutely can't do a ticking second hand. It drives me nuts lol. For that reason, I bought a Breitling Aerospace to scratch my HAQ itch.

Two... I've seen those and I tried them on. I live 4 miles from a GS AD, so I'm there quite often. I just cannot agree with the bezel. The font is just wrong to my eyes and regardless of the angle I looked it it, it just wasn't right.

In summary, i would pay 3700 or even more for a HAQ Grand Seiko, but not for this one. if I did, it would be the gorgeous Self Dater homage.





Too bad I can't get over the second hand.


Sent from my iPhone 6 Plus using Tapatalk
That is a cool watch!
I'm not too fond of the new divers either, I prefer a cheap 7s26 powered skx diver, they're sooo much fun.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote