Quote:
Originally Posted by fskywalker
As a follow-up to my post, I have since switched from the 39 mm to the 36 mm size as preferred the proportions of the original size; anyway for those who liked the bigger 39 mm size the 214270 is hard to beat as a great under the radar watch!  |
Hi gang. This my first post to the forum. I'm considering entering the Rolex world with an explorer 114270 both for the aesthetics fskywalker mentioned and the fact I have bird bones LOL.
It's interesting how elegant simplicity has kind of snuck up on me. I've gazed at a lot of watches over the last year, bought and sold a couple, and the Explorer (I) that looked so boring back then has slowly risen to the top of the list.
Funny how that happens.