Quote:
Originally Posted by jrs146
I'm in agreement with you. A community that relies on "trusted sellers" should have the right to post concerns and leave documentation of unsatisfactory transactions REGARDLESS of wheather or not the seller is liable. I'm not saying that slander is allowable, but there will be situations (like this) where whacky things happen... It should be noted and documented. A seller must earn their "trusted" status. I know this is easy to say because I'm not the seller, but if it were me I would caugh up the $500 to have the watch rethreaded just on principle. Now you have a happy buyer and documentation to a community that you go above and beyond, even when it's not necessary. Now that's being "trusted". Just my 2 cents  |
To add on this would go both ways; for example if a particular user has had multiple instances of running into similar issues with other sellers.