View Single Post
Old 3 July 2017, 11:44 PM   #89
aleeboy
"TRF" Member
 
aleeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbx View Post
I don't know that he has been dishonest. That's a bit of a leap. As I mentioned I have not searched the Sellers Who's Who - to see if he has any feedback. It's clear from the seller's photos that the watch band has seen some serious activity. It's reasonable to assume the watch head has seen the same. It's scratched pretty well. And the watch head photo from the seller shows some signs of scratching. The lighting in both photos (seller and buyer) is complimentary to each respective side of the sale.

I'm more likely to bet on a sure thing rather than an unknown to save $450.
Yes, there are photos, which you can scrutinise to the nth degree. However, the description was misleading. This calls into question the integrity of the seller in this case. I am certain no one will think because they paid a good price, they should take it on the chin that the actual is very different to what you have been led to believe.
aleeboy is offline   Reply With Quote