I don't know how many deviations Rolex makes in dials, but a logo is something that usually shouldn't change, at least within the same era.
For example, the crown in the logo on the dial does not look right to me.
Neither does the kerning below, but i could see deviations there.
This is just a simple observation and in no means am i saying something is fake or not
__________________
Sea-Dweller 116600 - the manly one
GMT II 16710 - the manly one
Daytona 116500 - the manly-womanly one
Yacht-Master 268622 - the chick version
Speedy Mitsukoshi <3
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAF141C.BA0824 - the chick version
Thank you logan5tx!!! Have to link it. Too long for the signature.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...0&postcount=14