Quote:
Originally Posted by Pay M3
Why do people continue asking this? All it takes is some simple math to realize it’s not a good investment and is in fact meant to be worn as a watch. This same argument gets made in other markets as well and it blows my mind.
8k over a 30 year period at a modest return of 7% with traditional investments will net you more of a return (roughly 55-60k) than your average Rolex unless you get lucky with a unicorn piece.
Stop worrying about this stuff and buy the thing.
|
Not that this should be taken as the norm nor your motivating factor towards making a purchase, but my collection is up 40% and the oldest piece I own was purchased in 2014...
I agree that watches are not an “investment” in the traditional sense, but substantial returns may nonetheless be made