View Single Post
Old 31 July 2019, 02:08 PM   #27
rambo99
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tokyo
Watch: SD43,PAM1616,Hulk
Posts: 3,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by eonflux View Post
I had a 682.

Love the size and weight.
A 44mm Sub with the 1950s case would be cool.

The 682 bezel does have more play than on my DSSD, and doesn't feel as refined. The 682 bezel moves in 1-min clicks vs the 1/2-min intervals of the DSSD bezel. But overall, the 682 bezel was fine.

The rotor was loud, but I didn't mind.
I had the display back and loved looking at the movement. Shame they went to the more generic Richemont movement. I liked the independent hour hand on the p.9010. Made travel easier.
I tried both 682 and 1616 in a boutique, the bezel on the 1616 turns much smoother and clicks clearer and louder. looks like they have updated the bezel.
rambo99 is offline   Reply With Quote