Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum - View Single Post

scrog10 · 11 November 2011, 07:57 AM

I had the Sub 14060M a while ago. Mine was a 4 liner but still a great watch. Iconic it is. The only reason I sold it was because I had a hard time accepting the bracelet on such a high value watch.
So now I have the GMT 2c. Bracelet way way better. I prefer the maxi dial and the bezel is a joy to use compared to the Sub.
Though I'm not a cyclops fan but than can be fixed.
The clean lines of the Sub you have are fantastic. It really is a great looking watch.
The GMTc actually feels like an expensive watch. The quality is a serious step up over the 14060M .
That said $3000 to change doesn't sound like a great deal. Over here in the UK the 14060M sell for £2600 + and there not getting any cheaper.

11 November 2011, 07:57 AM	#47
scrog10 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Simon Location: Devon U.K Watch: Rolex GMT 2c Posts: 240	Sub for GMT c I had the Sub 14060M a while ago. Mine was a 4 liner but still a great watch. Iconic it is. The only reason I sold it was because I had a hard time accepting the bracelet on such a high value watch. So now I have the GMT 2c. Bracelet way way better. I prefer the maxi dial and the bezel is a joy to use compared to the Sub. Though I'm not a cyclops fan but than can be fixed. The clean lines of the Sub you have are fantastic. It really is a great looking watch. The GMTc actually feels like an expensive watch. The quality is a serious step up over the 14060M . That said $3000 to change doesn't sound like a great deal. Over here in the UK the 14060M sell for £2600 + and there not getting any cheaper. __________________ IWC Aquatimer 2000, Rolex GMT 2c[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC], Breitling Aerospace.