View Single Post
Old 6 August 2018, 12:58 PM   #4495
jschmidtdmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern View Post
And that's why I'm saying it's shortsighted for RM. It's shortsighted because they're painting themselves into a corner that'll be hard to get out of during the next cyclical downturn.

RM doesn't have the resources Patek or Rolex have. Also, it's not impossible to get a Daytona, 5711, 15202. But it appears to be close to impossible to get an RM 11-03.
I felt this way about 2 years ago- when this was just starting. (I sold most of my pieces at that time).

Boy was I wrong- lost a lot of money, and a lot of great watches I can’t get back today.

Now, I feel they are the best positioned of any brand, with the BEST marketing. I think they know exactly what corner the’re in, and I think they know their market is completely resistant to the economy or market. 5,000 pieces a year is a lot different than 50,000.

I have a lot of the resentment and same opinions posted above, but at this point it’s part of the brand and the game.
__________________
Watches!
jschmidtdmd is offline   Reply With Quote