View Single Post
Old 22 May 2008, 07:28 AM   #19
Tony-GB
"TRF" Member
 
Tony-GB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmt 16750 View Post
because it's very hard to date a Tudor watch accurately and I know for a fact that both 791** and 792** with 'Oysterdate' on the dial should have Rolex case/crown and that both the 'Prince date' dial & 'Tiger' dial models are both quite correct to have Tudor case/crown but the 'Prince date' ones signed Rolex could quite easily be 'made' that way after the original sale to be more desirable.
Just my humble opinion
- Neil.
That is VERY interesting.

Thanks Neil
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?"

http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/

www.cheetah.org
Tony-GB is offline   Reply With Quote