View Single Post
Old 24 July 2018, 05:03 PM   #12
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomaspp View Post
Here’s the issue from my humble perspective:

Way too many are made and the catalog is riddled with variations of them. For the most part, they have generic movements and are usually paired with larger cases (as compared to their perpetual counterparts). The annual calendar complication detracts in some instances from watches that don’t need them (5235! Thinking of you). All of this contributes to low potential for long term collectibility and poor value retention although I guess they make fine everyday watches if that’s what you want in a watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry, I disagree entirely.. Grand complications, complications, calatravas and even Nautilus also come in many variations so why just pick on AC? They serve a purpose in the product offerings of Patek.

Value retention generally speaking in PP range is only Nautilus and selected reference ( most of them discontinued like 5970s, 5070s ). Other than these, most of them don't really hold value well.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote