Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum - View Single Post

walds11 · 18 July 2008, 08:33 PM

Vanessa, thanks for the info.

How about the 14060M? Same as the 16610? Somewhere I saw that the case thickness of the 14060M is .2mm thinner than the 16610.

18 July 2008, 08:33 PM	#13
walds11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Adam Location: Philly ‘burbs Posts: 5,632	Vanessa, thanks for the info. How about the 14060M? Same as the 16610? Somewhere I saw that the case thickness of the 14060M is .2mm thinner than the 16610. __________________ Adam