View Single Post
Old 24 September 2018, 07:34 AM   #51
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,744
We are continuously evolving.. Expecting everything to stay the same is unrealistic to me. In my eyes the 'new' Submariner is just as iconic Rolex as the ones that came before. Prior to the 16610 was the 1680, 5508 etc etc.. Should we then say that the 16610 is not a submariner because it doesn't resemble the 5508?
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote