View Single Post
Old 17 February 2017, 04:10 PM   #2
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by Culley22 View Post
So.....I'm dipping my toes into Panerai. I've solidly put my choice at 47mm. So, that left me basically looking at the 372, and 422. At first I wasn't a fan of the second hand, but I can understand it's usefulness (is this watch working?). AND THEN I saw the 663, but this has the tobacco/brown dial. Apparently it is a "limited" run, but it doesn't have the sandwich dial (which I like better), but I think I could overlook that. I'm just not so sure of the brown dial on the rustic brown leather strap. I like the black dial look, just not sure on the brown.

So...I'm stuck: 372 (hard to find), 422 (can be found), or the 663 which is more expensive and "limited", but not a sandwich dial...and I'm not sure how it'll wear. So...yeah...

What say ye?
I wouldn't go for the 663 for two reasons. Firstly, you prefer the sandwich dial, which it doesn't have. Secondly, I'm not sure about that tobacco dial as your one and only PAM. Part of a collection, maybe, but not as a one and only.

I like the 422 and it would seem weird to me to have a watch with no second hand but I'd still leave it behind in a zombie apocalypse. I like it but I don't zombie apocalypse like it.

For me, it would have to be the 372. About as pure Panerai DNA as Panerai gets and even more appealing now that it has a sapphire glass (which goes against its DNA but makes it much more practical to me).

WARNING: Do NOT look at post #7:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=521725

Good luck
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737

"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote