Thread: DD II vs DD 40
View Single Post
Old 21 June 2019, 02:09 AM   #27
Alan111
"TRF" Member
 
Alan111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
You have to see both IRL, personally I think the DD2 looks odd. The DD40 is a much nicer watch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
Agree as a former owner of the 2 I'd go for the 40 now, better proportions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wcdhtwn View Post
DD2’s proportions are a mess. I’m surprised they aren’t less expensive on Gray/ 2nd hand market. DD40 is perfect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monte Cristo View Post
DD2 looks a little bloated.
DD40 for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ballzzz View Post
I love the size of the DDII but think the open romans on the DD40 are sexier.

Preference imho - see both - try both before buying
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jp28 View Post
DD40 every time. Size really works. DDII is too big.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDon2000 View Post
The DD40 has absolutely perfect proportions. The DD2 isn't terrible but in my opinion (very strong) I think it looks like trash, bloated, and odd. DD40 hands down.
Instead of writing my own reply, I just quoted my sentiments from other comments here. There’s a reason Rolex discontinued the II. But on the right person (roughly 7.75” + wrist size), the DDII will be a perfect fit.
Alan111 is offline   Reply With Quote