Quote:
Originally Posted by rumnyc
This is the most ridiculous comment i have ever read to justify poor quality. Patek entry level watches are 30k presumably because of the quality and not just name.
Sounds like patek is milking the fans for its name if above is actually true.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
No and Yes. Nothing ridiculous with pointing out what is patently true. Don’t like the cost/quality ratio? Don’t buy Patek. I’m sure they’re devastated. And once more for those unable to read properly: I have justified nothing. I’m just pointing out facts. You’re free to presume whatever you want, though.
The guy in the other thread with the smudged hands and microscratches on a supposedly new 5170 got a full refund. Anyone in their right minds think that the TS here would get a refund for having visibly unfinished hands under 20x magnification? Or that said oversight is actually unintended? Not a chance, imo.