[rmlovett1]

Originally Posted by lbhphx23

I think it is the opposite of what others have said. The 1392 is the prior iteration of the piece with the in-house movement. The 2392 is the brand new iteration with the OP XXXIV movement that is being used in many of the newer pieces. You can compare it to the older 682 Submersible with the in-house movement (same as 1392) and then the newer 973, which is the same watch with the Richemont movement.

What I can tell you is that the new movement kind of sucks for this price point. I have the 1392 and have had the 682. I have also had the 973 and the 683 - both the newer non-in house movement and they both were not great. No quick set hour, the minute hand often jumped when resetting time and pushing crown back in, both ran at about +11 and neither were very impressive for the money. Sold both the 973 and 683; the in-house P9000 on the 1392 and 682 has been perfection (but be prepared for a loud rotor).

Hope this helps!

LBH

Excellent info! Thank you