View Single Post
Old 4 September 2012, 11:21 AM   #34
Lt.Arclight
"TRF" Member
 
Lt.Arclight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Todd
Location: New Jersey
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by canwatchco View Post
I am so tired of the movement debate on Breitlings. I have owned litterally dozens of them, and as a whole they have proved to be incredibly accurate and reliable. And, they are built like tanks. Test drive the new superocean 44 before buying a new Sub or Deep Sea. one jalf to one third the cost, and it looks, feels and performs equally.

I think Breitling has done a brilliant job with their marketing, and I truly think that they have a fantastic lineup.

Cheers.
Exactly. They get people to pay big money for movements that they CASE.As far as keeping time- a Casio quartz puts all mechanical movements to shame. There is NOTHING wrong with ETA or Valjoux movements-they easily can meet COSC specs. Taking your argument one step further- why even consider a Patek or an AP? Anyway you look at it the fact is you are paying for an expensive case with a generic movement. Why did they feel they needed to engineer a new in-house movement-you won't be getting that at 1/3 the cost of a new SS sub.
Lt.Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote