14 March 2018, 06:23 AM
|
#31
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 5,952
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockae92
Just my personal preference. The lume shot of 590 seems to be missing "something" at 3 o'clock.
For a P5000 8-day movement, I prefer a display case back. I do own a 000 and I have no problem with the solid case back. Just that I see 590 as a higher level PAM, and would prefer to "see the movement".
For some reason 390 is a limited edition, but 590 is not. Though my impress is that 590 is the 8-day version of 390.
My preference is the older ETA movement PAM (000, 111, 112, 113, 114, etc)
But I also like the newer 562 and 564 titanium. I think they are well executed.
I wouldn't mind the newer white dial (561, etc) either, because I think they improved the lume on them.
Let me clarify, there is nothing "wrong" with 590. Only personal preference. :)
|
I vote PAM and initially went to try 590. Fell in love with 390 as base is totally different experience
__________________
@imrootbeer7
|
|
|