Quote:
Originally Posted by Roddypeepa
But the price for the 321... [emoji31]. It’s a mickey take. I know that significant R and D costs have been incurred but come on - it’s a 1960s design. If omega neglected to save their blue prints in their archives then that’s their bad.
|
I agree.
I really dig this watch. And I'm a huge fan of Omega (I have more Speedy's in the collection than I can remember in my head without looking at my list), but I can't bring myself to spend Rolex Daytona money on it.
Yes, I know you can't get an SS Daytona at MSRP, but some people can. Even then, the 321 SS is priced higher than the SS Daytona (at MSRP). That's kind of crazy.