Quote:
Originally Posted by LFFL
Which model were these movements pulled from, and apply to which manufacture year? Could anyone confirm if the 'SUPERLATIVE ADJ." revision fixes the low amplitude issue? Sorry if I missed it if already been covered.
|
Left photo: Datejust 36, posted on Instagram by Rolex in 02/2023.
Right photo: Datejust 41, posted on TRF by Bas in 03/2019.
My question "Or does the new engraving come along with an improved 32xx movement which contains some visible component modifications to cure the 32xx issue(s)?" was not answered directly but no visible component modification and often no component wear detectable.
The root cause of issues seems to be (or is) the 32xx design including the migration of lubricants, so basically 'everything' imo.
Apropos design: the Rolex 32xx calibers have only one mainspring barrel for approx. 70 hours of power reserve. Fifty Fathoms movements (1151, 1315) have 2 or 3 series-coupled barrels for 100 or 120 hours power reserve, which is much better imo.