View Single Post
Old 20 June 2019, 11:53 AM   #15
SN13
"TRF" Member
 
SN13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z-Sub View Post
isn't YM's WR rating 100m as well? I checked the thickness using naked eye between my Sub and my GMT, there is visible difference. Also, I compare it with a Daytona from a friend, Sub's caseback was also thicker than daytona visibly.
Well, I have an early 16628 YM (N26XXXX 1991/1992) and I opened her up...

I remembered to measure the caseback thickness before I put her back together.

0.84mm

I can also confirm, this is the same thickness as the 16710 or 16718 casebacks. (See photo)

__________________
IG@Construction_Time

--- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO
SN13 is offline   Reply With Quote