View Single Post
Old 21 April 2008, 01:16 AM   #27
acce1999
"TRF" Member
 
acce1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
Interesting. So the 24 h hand did move whilst changing timezones? I do not remember if it was sheldonsmith or tahoeblue that concluded that the wiggle test is not enough to conclude that you have a 3186. What most likely is true is that IF the 24 h hand do NOT move you can be pretty certain (but not totally ;-)) you have the 3186, but if it moves you can have the 3185 OR the 3186, as obviously proven by TempoKing. So "non-wiggle" = 3186, "wiggle" = says nothing...

Just to make sure though. The minute hand seems to wiggle slightly on both 3186 and 3185, whilst the 24 h hand seems to be absolutely still.

Perhaps I have to pop my M-serial ExII (with no wiggle) open anyway... I am curious on the possibility to find more facts.

What I do have hard to believe is Rolex "testing" the 3186 in a series of 16710 before rolling them out in 116710. In that case they should have rolled them out a year or so before the 18k GMT-IIc was launched (which was first to use the 3186), and if that was the case this issue would have been discussed a long time ago, having 16710s from 2005 or so equipped with 3186.

Best,

A
acce1999 is offline   Reply With Quote