Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea
Kind of hoping Paul sees this thread and comments ... I wonder if he’s seen it?
|
Seen it, tried it and, if I’m honest, was a little underwhelmed by it. I don’t dislike it but, and this is going to sound a bit messed up, it was lacking something. I don’t know what, but it felt like there was something missing. It was if I had a non-functioning prototype on my wrist and not the real thing. Doesn’t look all that much in the flesh either, I’d much rather a 389
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=610960
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick c
We’re is Paul?^^
|
I’m here, mate.
My head is elsewhere of late; got a lot going on with moving back to the UK in just over three weeks and yet another injury keeping me out of the gym
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737
"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons