ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 February 2015, 01:45 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Watch: TT Daytona
Posts: 253
|
Master coaxial query
Master coaxial or just coaxial- what's the difference?
The top-of-the-line PO has Coaxial on it's dial, the new Seamaster has Master Coaxial |
19 February 2015, 03:32 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Master co-axial is antimagnetic to 15,000 gauss.
The co-axial is not, although it does have a non magnetic hairspring and some resistance to magnetism, just not to the extent of the master line. |
20 February 2015, 01:54 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Watch: TT Daytona
Posts: 253
|
Are you sure? Even the 15,000 gauss has only "co-axial" on the dial.
|
20 February 2015, 04:31 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Minneapolis
Watch: 3573/BB
Posts: 2,401
|
He is right. The 15,000 was the first to use the movement and it was still called co-axial. That movement is now in most aqua terras and is labeled as master co-axial. It is the same movement as the gauss...just with a new name to it. It distinguishes older AT models with the newer ones.
My understanding of it anyways.
__________________
Ryan ______________ |
20 February 2015, 06:55 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
It is the only watch with the 8508 caliber. For whatever reason, they did away with the 8508 caliber and went back to calling it the 8500, but added "master" to the title. So, 8508 caliber in the bumblee is the same as the master co-axial 8500 movement. The co-axial 8500 movement that remains in the PO still is not fully anti magnetic. |
|
20 February 2015, 07:12 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,037
|
I've been told by several Omega boutique employees that by the end of 2016 all Omegas with in-house movements will have the >15k anti-magnetic movements. They didn't mention that they would be called master coaxial, though. I'll be courious to see how that plays out. A new reference number or just a new label.
|
20 February 2015, 07:28 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
For all the people, money and resources Omega and Swatch have, to this day I cannot figure out 1) who came up with the "master' designation and 2) who approved it. Introducing the all new Seamaster Aqua Terra Master Co-Axial. Talk about a mouthful. Bad marketing if you ask me. |
|
20 February 2015, 09:17 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 265
|
Quote:
|
|
20 February 2015, 09:56 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Smoke And Mirrors=Marketing
|
20 February 2015, 01:24 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Watch: TT Daytona
Posts: 253
|
Quote:
And to illustrate this, they have a pic of the bumblebee- without the prefix! Strange are the ways of Omega |
|
20 February 2015, 02:04 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
Master is the > 15 loads of articles on it. Useful if you work with MRI machines, speakers or or other situations that put you close to magnetism
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most' |
20 February 2015, 03:29 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
My PO 8500 has never had an issue though. The one thing I've never seen a definitive answer on is the actual resistance in gauss of the regular 8500s with the Si14 balance spring. Also fwiw, Patek has a whole video on their website devoted to magnetism issues in the service section. So obviously Omega is not alone in seeing this as an issue. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.