ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

rushca01 · 27 February 2016, 02:22 AM

Looking at this Sea Dweller, no box or papers.

sleddog · 27 February 2016, 04:49 AM

As long as that's the one you get, the watch in the pictures looks good!

Comacho · 27 February 2016, 06:08 AM

Watch looks good! But as always... BUY THE SELLER!

strafer_kid · 27 February 2016, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Comacho

Watch looks good! But as always... BUY THE SELLER!

The way to go!

jay_kay · 27 February 2016, 06:42 AM

Watch and bracelet both agree and date to about 2002. Watch looks good

nick c · 27 February 2016, 07:45 AM

Good here

crowncollection · 27 February 2016, 07:58 AM

Looks good

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chewbacca · 27 February 2016, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rushca01

Looking at this Sea Dweller, no box or papers.

not sure what you're asking but, looks ok. good luck (i think...?) !

AbsolutelyROLEX! · 27 February 2016, 11:37 AM

As others have said, make sure the watch in the pics is what you get

rushca01 · 27 February 2016, 11:44 AM

I think I have decided to pass on this one. Seller and I can't agree on price and this one looks like it's been polished a few times. I can be patient in finding the right dweller.

bayerische · 27 February 2016, 06:52 PM

I would pass, too much polished for my taste.

rushca01 · 27 February 2016, 11:43 PM

To get what I want I may have to give up on looking for a 2002 holes case (last year for the holes case as I understand it) and broaden my search to the mid 2003-2007.

rushca01 · 28 February 2016, 01:57 AM

Additional photos from the seller in daylight

red1108nyc · 28 February 2016, 07:00 AM

I would make sure the seller did not just grab the picture off the net and the lugs look round.

michael067 · 28 February 2016, 08:21 AM

27 February 2016, 02:22 AM	#1
rushca01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Indiana Watch: GMT BLRO Posts: 1,742	Help with Sea Dweller Looking at this Sea Dweller, no box or papers.

27 February 2016, 04:49 AM	#2
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,907	As long as that's the one you get, the watch in the pictures looks good! __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

27 February 2016, 06:42 AM	#5
jay_kay "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Barrowford Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54 Posts: 1,699	Watch and bracelet both agree and date to about 2002. Watch looks good __________________ Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1

27 February 2016, 07:58 AM	#7
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,165	Looks good Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

27 February 2016, 11:37 AM	#9
AbsolutelyROLEX! "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: AKA: ANDERL712000 Posts: 4,935	As others have said, make sure the watch in the pics is what you get __________________ We want to be the first in the field and Rolex should be seen as the one and only-the best. Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex founder

27 February 2016, 06:08 AM	#3
Comacho "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: texas Watch: Submariner 168000 Posts: 265	Watch looks good! But as always... BUY THE SELLER!

27 February 2016, 07:45 AM	#6
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	Good here

27 February 2016, 11:44 AM	#10
rushca01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Indiana Watch: GMT BLRO Posts: 1,742	I think I have decided to pass on this one. Seller and I can't agree on price and this one looks like it's been polished a few times. I can be patient in finding the right dweller.

27 February 2016, 06:52 PM	#11
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	I would pass, too much polished for my taste. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

27 February 2016, 11:43 PM	#12
rushca01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Indiana Watch: GMT BLRO Posts: 1,742	To get what I want I may have to give up on looking for a 2002 holes case (last year for the holes case as I understand it) and broaden my search to the mid 2003-2007.

28 February 2016, 01:57 AM	#13
rushca01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Indiana Watch: GMT BLRO Posts: 1,742	Additional photos from the seller in daylight

28 February 2016, 07:00 AM	#14
red1108nyc 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Fred Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area Watch: Rolex Posts: 8,506	I would make sure the seller did not just grab the picture off the net and the lugs look round.

28 February 2016, 08:21 AM	#15
michael067 Banned Join Date: Feb 2016 Real Name: Mike Location: Las Vegas Watch: TT DJ 16233 Posts: 1,002

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)