The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 July 2014, 04:08 AM   #1
MrJ320
"TRF" Member
 
MrJ320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: James
Location: Toronto
Watch: IG: @j.project
Posts: 2,194
Would you sell 233 for a Dark Side of the Moon?

I know the watches are very different, but lately the Omega dark side of the moon has really caught my eye, and really conflicted as to whether I should sell my 233K dot dial to fund it. I consider the 233 to be one of Panerai's modern classics, and my only manual wind watch.

But the DSotM is just so well constructed, and I really like the all ceramic construction (including pushers, crown, and dial), and both the polished and brushed effects on the watch. It also has a great in-house movement, just like the 233.

Unfortunately I can't keep the 233 and get the DSotM, so if you are in my position, would you sell the 233? Appreciate everyone's input and thoughts.

Will also post in the Omega sub-forum to see how the reactions differ
MrJ320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 06:01 AM   #2
fullcourt
"TRF" Member
 
fullcourt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: dp
Location: chicago, usa
Watch: panerai
Posts: 2,369
nope
__________________
dp
just living the dream
chicago, usa

chgo_risti on IG
fullcourt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 06:57 AM   #3
soho
2024 Pledge Member
 
soho's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,041
Would you sell 233 for a Dark Side of the Moon?

It sounds like you really like you 233, so no. The DSOTM is very impressive though, and I can see why you like it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
soho is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 07:15 AM   #4
ELITEVIDEOGAMES
"TRF" Member
 
ELITEVIDEOGAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: Long Island NY
Watch: me sell games
Posts: 1,898
I think the 233 is a classic and the DSOTM is just a new interpretation of the classic speed master and may not hold its luster in time. With that said the dark side does look great so do what you like!
ELITEVIDEOGAMES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 07:19 AM   #5
gougy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Prague, Czech rep
Watch: one on my wrist
Posts: 242
Have you tried the Omega on your wrist? Adorable for someone but can be too flashy too. Well actually exactly like your PAM. Tough call. I am afraid I can not help. What about the chrono, do you have one in your collection? But then again - the PAM movement is gorgeous. You need both, they are so different ;)
gougy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 07:20 AM   #6
Kobayashi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: Any Rolex!
Posts: 1,060
Would you sell 233 for a Dark Side of the Moon?

I love everything about TDSOTM.....except the price. I was offered a 10% discount BNIB and I probably could've negotiated more. But I walked away. Tough choice as both are great watches.

Kobayashi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 07:23 AM   #7
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,623
Both are really awesome. Go with your gut. Personally, the 8-day manual + GMT + dome + strap madness pushes the needle to the 233. Buuuuut, if I really really wanted the DSOTM, I would at least consider the trade if I could stretch the budget and add a 000.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 07:38 AM   #8
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,222
I'd keep the 233
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 09:28 AM   #9
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
Tough call... Both are nice.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 11:59 AM   #10
jamesr
"TRF" Member
 
jamesr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: James R.
Location: IL
Watch: 1675
Posts: 32
not a chance, keep the 233
jamesr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 12:08 PM   #11
sebastien1975
"TRF" Member
 
sebastien1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Sebastien
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 788
I would also seriously consider
sebastien1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 01:54 PM   #12
Alfredo.
"TRF" Member
 
Alfredo.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 3,639
I would honestly flip it for the DSOM. I saw it the other day in person and it looks amazing. The feel of the strap and the look of the movement is very nice. I would visit and AD to take a look at both watches together and it will make whatever decision you take a whole lot easier.
__________________
After reading all posts, I agree with Adam!
Alfredo. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 02:39 PM   #13
MrJ320
"TRF" Member
 
MrJ320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: James
Location: Toronto
Watch: IG: @j.project
Posts: 2,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by gougy View Post
Have you tried the Omega on your wrist? Adorable for someone but can be too flashy too. Well actually exactly like your PAM. Tough call. I am afraid I can not help. What about the chrono, do you have one in your collection? But then again - the PAM movement is gorgeous. You need both, they are so different ;)
It's been quite difficult to track down a DSotM at the ADs in town, and so haven't had a chance to try it in person yet. I agree I do want to see it in person to see how "shiny" the polished ceramic bezel, case and dial would be. Being able to own both the 233 and the DSotM would definitely be the best case scenario, but unfortunately not possible so thus the dilemma.

I think I do need to find one to try on in person.
MrJ320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 02:44 PM   #14
MrJ320
"TRF" Member
 
MrJ320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: James
Location: Toronto
Watch: IG: @j.project
Posts: 2,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobayashi View Post
I love everything about TDSOTM.....except the price. I was offered a 10% discount BNIB and I probably could've negotiated more. But I walked away. Tough choice as both are great watches.

Great wrist shot! I agree the price of the DSotM is quite high, and one of the reasons I am hesitant on picking one up as well.

In terms of thickness would you consider the DSotM to be comparable to a Panerai or is it even thicker?
MrJ320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 03:34 PM   #15
jay_man2
"TRF" Member
 
jay_man2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
I tried on a DSoTM at the local Omega Boutique last weekend. It's thinner than my 164, 351 or 005, but thicker than my Radiomir.
jay_man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 04:05 PM   #16
htc8p
"TRF" Member
 
htc8p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,450
Since I cant choose both I would go with the dsom watch because it is ceramic and long warranty
htc8p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 05:32 PM   #17
Kobayashi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: Any Rolex!
Posts: 1,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrJ320 View Post
Great wrist shot! I agree the price of the DSotM is quite high, and one of the reasons I am hesitant on picking one up as well.



In terms of thickness would you consider the DSotM to be comparable to a Panerai or is it even thicker?

My preference is for slim, low profile watches and while this wasn't ultra thin I didn't notice the thickness so for me that meant it was a perfect fit as I have 6 1/2inch wrists. The ceramic is very shiny and I think part of what appeals about this watch. I couldn't help being mesmerized the entire time. But at $10k plus I can't justify the expense when there are others in that price range I'd rather have. Best of luck!
Kobayashi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 06:15 PM   #18
MP5
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
MP5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay_man2 View Post
I tried on a DSoTM at the local Omega Boutique last weekend. It's thinner than my 164, 351 or 005, but thicker than my Radiomir.
I dont know if it felt that way but the 005 and 164 are documented thinner by quite a margin
MP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2014, 08:26 PM   #19
jay_man2
"TRF" Member
 
jay_man2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by MP5 View Post
I dont know if it felt that way but the 005 and 164 are documented thinner by quite a margin
I guess the lighter weight helped create the illusion that it was a thinner piece.
jay_man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2014, 02:25 AM   #20
Auto16610
"TRF" Member
 
Auto16610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: Santa Cruz
Watch: RolexOmegaPanerai
Posts: 1,174
233!

All day long! An iconic piece that has a way more higher "cool" factor.
Auto16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2014, 03:51 AM   #21
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
I would keep the 233 but then I'm not much of an Omega fan
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2014, 04:12 AM   #22
gotmpower
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Rich
Location: S.F
Posts: 271
No
gotmpower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2014, 04:30 AM   #23
One Ping Only
"TRF" Member
 
One Ping Only's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Ken
Location: WI
Watch: several
Posts: 1,639
I might do it. The DSOM is great in person and on the wrist. The 233 is perhaps "the" modern Panerai, but it's not like they won't be available if you change your mind, or want to have both in the future.
__________________
I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one.
One Ping Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2014, 05:40 AM   #24
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
Personally, no. 233 is nice...
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2014, 11:01 AM   #25
Dom
"TRF" Member
 
Dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dominik
Location: Zürich
Watch: Rolex, Patek, FPJ
Posts: 381
233 for me. Omega have moved up market though. Prices just faster than the watches reputation.
Dom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2014, 12:16 PM   #26
MrJ320
"TRF" Member
 
MrJ320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: James
Location: Toronto
Watch: IG: @j.project
Posts: 2,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobayashi View Post
My preference is for slim, low profile watches and while this wasn't ultra thin I didn't notice the thickness so for me that meant it was a perfect fit as I have 6 1/2inch wrists. The ceramic is very shiny and I think part of what appeals about this watch. I couldn't help being mesmerized the entire time. But at $10k plus I can't justify the expense when there are others in that price range I'd rather have. Best of luck!
Good to know as I have a 6.5" wrist as well. Yes, I think the shiny ceramic is the main attraction for me to the DSotM. Need to find one to try on!
MrJ320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2014, 12:42 PM   #27
KellyM3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Attleboro mass
Posts: 209
No
KellyM3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2014, 02:59 PM   #28
alexlt730512
"TRF" Member
 
alexlt730512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,245
no way
alexlt730512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 July 2014, 01:12 AM   #29
zlin08033
"TRF" Member
 
zlin08033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,033
No.
zlin08033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2014, 04:14 PM   #30
drivenlifestyle
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: PAM 171
Posts: 347
233!
drivenlifestyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.