ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Star Ferry · 8 June 2016, 04:26 PM

I'm wondering -- let's use NYC RSC and a 114060 as an example -- is it cheaper to have RSC replace worn parts, or is it cheaper to buy a new watch?

e.g. If RSC were to service the 114060 movement and replace the bezel, crown, bracelet and case, would this cost more or less than a brand new 114060?

DCheeta · 8 June 2016, 04:39 PM

That's an interesting question. I wonder what they'd say if you brought it in and asked for every external part to be replaced, and what the cost would be.

8 June 2016, 04:26 PM	#1
Star Ferry Banned Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: down by the river Posts: 4,926	In the long run, is RSC cheaper than replacement? I'm wondering -- let's use NYC RSC and a 114060 as an example -- is it cheaper to have RSC replace worn parts, or is it cheaper to buy a new watch? e.g. If RSC were to service the 114060 movement and replace the bezel, crown, bracelet and case, would this cost more or less than a brand new 114060?

8 June 2016, 04:39 PM	#2
DCheeta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Dave Location: NYC Posts: 7,180	That's an interesting question. I wonder what they'd say if you brought it in and asked for every external part to be replaced, and what the cost would be.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)