|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 December 2017, 03:16 AM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
116660 vs 16600
I was told by someone that the 16600 is actually more "top heavy" and floppy on the wrist then the Deep Sea...???
 Any one who has owned both please enlighten me... |
|
|
|
23 December 2017, 03:17 AM
|
#2 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,507
|
Both 16600 and 116600 fit perfect for me but the 116660 is definitely more top heavy.
|
|
|
|
|
23 December 2017, 03:17 AM
|
#3 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,302
|
No, not more top heavy, but maybe more than the SD43.
|
|
|
|
|
23 December 2017, 03:50 AM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,709
|
Quote:
How floppy they are depends on how loose or snug they are worn 
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...  ), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNRPresent: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
|
|
|
23 December 2017, 07:05 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,742
|
Realized you were asking about the deepsea...I don’t own that one.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
