ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 April 2009, 10:30 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Follow-up w/ Timing-- Thoughts Appreciated
Ok, so I wanted to follow-up with all you Risti's regarding my 190. I took your advice and placed it face down, as well as face up to see what the affect would be.
On a full wind I'm -8 seconds per day face down and -5 seconds per day face up. Since I'm still under warranty until November, I'm thinking about a service. Would you do it? Thanks for your input.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
16 April 2009, 11:10 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: tui
Location: são paulo-brasil
Watch: panerai rolex
Posts: 772
|
no, it's good enough imo.
__________________
panerai and rolex |
16 April 2009, 07:53 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Tui is right...
|
17 April 2009, 12:02 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Siberia,yes it is
Posts: 640
|
Im with Tui , would not worry about this, i normally only service my watches once every 5 years , if its keeps within 10 sec's.
|
17 April 2009, 03:21 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jackson
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,893
|
Just because I am a freak... I would probably send it in. Under warranty and manufacturer doing it... I would do it or hold off until Oct... and see if it improves along the way. Then decide?
__________________
Jackson |
17 April 2009, 03:25 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
|
If my Rolex was that far off, I'd take it in to be regulated (when it is outside of COSC), especially under warranty.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread FcB |
18 April 2009, 01:25 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
...Well as was said in another thread I posted on this topic: It is a $10k watch w/ a JLC movement and it should act like one. That's my thought at least.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
18 April 2009, 01:32 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
If you have other watches to wear then go for it, for me i only send off if it's really needed as i hate being without the PAM for 3 months, but if you have others that you wear then it might be worth getting it looked over, regulated and cleaned.
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
18 April 2009, 05:03 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,524
|
Id send it in without a doubt....
Its under warranty, get them to take care of it. It may take time but they will make you happy in the long run.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
18 April 2009, 06:29 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
I would send it in 4 sure. It is a 10k watch with a JLC movement for Pete's pants!
__________________
member#3242 |
22 April 2009, 08:15 PM | #11 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,943
|
IMO it will run slower when fully wound.
__________________
E |
22 April 2009, 09:46 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: NH
Watch: Pam 312 & DJ II
Posts: 312
|
You shouldn't have to send it in just to be regulated, my Panerai AD and an authorized watch tech on staff and can regualte a watch there in under 10 minutes. If it does have to be sent in I would do it as that's just not right, my 111 is only adding about 1 second a day and that was only $4600, I would expect a $10k watch to be as equally accurate.
__________________
Cheers, Jeff ------------------------------------------------------ PAM 312, DJ II |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.