ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

shammad10 · 4 September 2023, 07:39 AM

Hello,
Just wondering if it is now widely accepted that there are some Mk0 dials in the 4.x mill serial range?
Seems that this watch from a UK dealer has one and another French collector seems to have found a few.

https://thewatchcollector.co.uk/coll...-mk0-prototype

https://watchmywatch.fr/2023/06/01/r...oure-a-genius/

However the drsd website says that they only started at 5.0-5.2mill.

https://www.drsd.com/watch-info/whit...eadweller.html

rootbeer7 · 4 September 2023, 04:28 PM

Watchcollector: The hands ‘might have been replaced’. So could the dial! Either way beautiful watch.

shammad10 · 4 September 2023, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rootbeer7

Watchcollector: The hands ‘might have been replaced’. So could the dial! Either way beautiful watch.

Haha- that made me chuckle too

swish77 · 5 September 2023, 12:10 AM

Legit or not, the problem is the widespread perception that those four GW SDs are about 1 million serial numbers away from the accepted range for MK0s. So, there will always be doubt ... unless a lot more show up.

It's certainly possible that a few late DRSDs had their dials switched at some point in their lives to the first GW dial variants .... or not. Also, the blog entry describing the watches doesn't put forth a strong argument, IMHO.

77T · 5 September 2023, 10:08 AM

Seller saying, 1665 MK0 “prototype”, is misleading with the thin provenance methinks.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

4 September 2023, 07:39 AM	#1
shammad10 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2021 Location: UK Posts: 821	1665 Mk 0 Sea Dweller. Hello, Just wondering if it is now widely accepted that there are some Mk0 dials in the 4.x mill serial range? Seems that this watch from a UK dealer has one and another French collector seems to have found a few. https://thewatchcollector.co.uk/coll...-mk0-prototype https://watchmywatch.fr/2023/06/01/r...oure-a-genius/ However the drsd website says that they only started at 5.0-5.2mill. https://www.drsd.com/watch-info/whit...eadweller.html

4 September 2023, 04:28 PM	#2
rootbeer7 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: london Posts: 5,993	Watchcollector: The hands ‘might have been replaced’. So could the dial! Either way beautiful watch. __________________ @imrootbeer7

5 September 2023, 10:08 AM	#5
77T 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 40,935	Seller saying, 1665 MK0 “prototype”, is misleading with the thin provenance methinks. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

5 September 2023, 12:10 AM	#4
swish77 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Aaron Location: CT/NYC Watch: ing the time! Posts: 6,829	Legit or not, the problem is the widespread perception that those four GW SDs are about 1 million serial numbers away from the accepted range for MK0s. So, there will always be doubt ... unless a lot more show up. It's certainly possible that a few late DRSDs had their dials switched at some point in their lives to the first GW dial variants .... or not. Also, the blog entry describing the watches doesn't put forth a strong argument, IMHO.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)