ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
7 September 2016, 11:29 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
|
16710 with a damaged case from a Trusted seller here
In the August of 2014, I bought a X series 16710 from one of the trusted sellers here. It was worn in the initial weeks, later it remained on the sidelines as I had other preferences. Recently, I was trying to wind the watch and the crown came off. So thought its service time. Took it to Rolex Service Centre and they came back saying the case needs to be replaced and the price for that is AUD 4180. Called them up, they said "thread in the case middle and the back is damaged". As per RSC, this damage existed before and said they can't fix it, instead wants to replace the whole case. On further questioning , RSC advised that upon opening the watch they noticed that the case and back were glued together. The watch is still at the RSC presently.
This was reported to the seller early last month, he suggested that RSC might have damaged the threads while opening it. Recommended me to contact a shop in US that rethreads cases and case backs. I rejected that suggestion & recommendation and advised him the other detail provided by the RSC "The watch was glued together". I requested him to take the watch back and return the money. He refused to do that citing his return policy "If the watch was misrepresented I will accept a return if notified within 48 hours of the buyer accepting the watch". These are the two facts I see.. 1.During my ownership of this watch, up until RSC opened it, it was only worn and not opened or checked inside (How would you expect these kind of things to happen. It was bought from a trusted seller here and there is no good reason to get it checked internally) 2.RSC found it glued together For now, I would go seller undisclosed. There is a reason why I came down to vintage section. 16710 by no means is a vintage but do we have to expect this kind of frailty in the case/case threads on a 25 year old watch?(seller keep pointing to the age of the watch) Are my demands gone overboard here? Appreciate your thoughts on the issue |
7 September 2016, 11:42 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
|
This is like 2 years later.....hmmmm......i am not sure i would expect the seller to do something here.....2 years is a while. That being written, most would step up and rectify if that were the case.
However, the glue is not good......a decent seller will authenticate and make sure what they are selling is correct.....so this is a coin toss. |
7 September 2016, 12:02 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Watch: SubC & Red;JLC RDM
Posts: 1,036
|
Sorry to hear this. Even from a trusted seller my first order of business is to take it to a RSC for authentication.
|
7 September 2016, 12:08 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,327
|
Way too much time has passed
|
7 September 2016, 12:19 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL230
Watch: me fly-by
Posts: 789
|
Agreed...
Good example of "Caveat Emptor"
__________________
GMT Master II 16710B BLRO--Sea Dweller 16600--Submariner 1680--Milgauss 116400--Tudor BB58 79030B--Omega Speedmaster Pro--IWC Mark XV Automatic--Breitling Aerospace |
7 September 2016, 05:10 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Sydney
Watch: SD43
Posts: 39
|
|
7 September 2016, 12:17 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Cranford
Posts: 704
|
How would someone be able to verify what you did or did not do with the watch since you purchased it (2 years ago)?
> no way of verifying Did the seller provide a warranty? > 48 hr return policy So I think you are beat. I guess the only remaining question is whether the seller knew of tampering or defects when they sold you the watch. I think the TRF community would like to know of a "trusted seller" that is dealing in questionable merchandise. -dan |
7 September 2016, 12:24 PM | #8 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 28,631
|
I feel your pain and sorry to hear this but after two years of ownership, I think you just have to eat the cost of the repairs. "Buyer Beware".
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day" TRF #139960 |
7 September 2016, 12:52 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
|
Quote:
Thanks for the responses dear gentlemen.. Yes, no way to verify what I did or what I didn't. So we are in an unfortunate situation where its one man's word against another man. Sellers response initially when this was reported "In all honesty i am a watch dealer and buy and sell lots of watches. i bought this from another dealer with no history.I did however take it to my watchmaker who put it on a timing machine and said its within cosec specs and it didn’t need a service and was running fine" . Later response from the seller where he tightens his argument further after more complaining from my side "The watch i will repeat was in working order when you bought it and even passed a water pressure test.". This is where I was bothered. If it passed pressure test, why was I not notified that straight away after I sent an E-mail to him informing that RSC found the watch was glued together. If you ever got the watch pressure tested, I think it will be the first detail you would want to pass on if the case stability/strength comes into question. Yes, I would reveal the seller not because of any of my grievances but because I feel this forum needs to know issues between buyers and sellers. Will need to size up things on this rather than just pulling the trigger in haste. |
|
7 September 2016, 12:20 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
|
Folks throw that "trusted seller" term around way too easily here. You really think all the "trusted sellers" here open up every Rolex they take in and inspect it before reselling it? I would always have my own inspection/authentication done when purchasing pre-owned....I don't care who the seller is. Way too much money involved not to independently validate.
|
7 September 2016, 12:25 PM | #11 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,386
|
Quote:
|
|
7 September 2016, 05:08 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,349
|
Quote:
1. Inspecting the exterior of the watch (dial, bracelet markings, case, etc.). This is important to find damage, aftermarket parts, etc.. 2. Removing the bracelet and checking for the serial and model number. This is especially important to ensure that the watch has not been tampered with, rebuilt, or altered from its true form (i.e. a stainless steel case reference which has been converted to a two tone). 3. Unscrew and twist the crown to make sure it winds properly and runs. 4. Open the caseback to ensure the authenticity of the movement/caseback and most importantly to make sure the movement does not show corrosion, rust, altered parts, etc. Personally, I always always always open the case back even when buying from a trusted dealer... trust but verify! Last edited by jvmartin; 7 September 2016 at 05:09 PM.. Reason: forgot some words |
|
7 September 2016, 12:29 PM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,200
|
Flip it
|
7 September 2016, 12:31 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 816
|
|
7 September 2016, 12:58 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
|
|
7 September 2016, 12:31 PM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,879
|
Unfortunate situation
|
7 September 2016, 12:31 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: 🤔
Posts: 8,424
|
Mine get sent to Vanessa not because I don't trust the seller, it's cause so issues like this don't come up. I don't think all sellers open the back up and double check. My 116619 was still stickerd so that's the only one I never sent to her.
I wonder if all sellers open the backs of watches traded to them. I bet they do.
__________________
♛ |
7 September 2016, 12:38 PM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 8,991
|
I usually take all of mine to RSC in BH for them to authenticate, resize bracelet, service, etc. Never have a problem with any of them (all from trusted sellers here).
|
7 September 2016, 01:10 PM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
|
Quote:
This shouldn't deter anyone from buying what they like from trusted sellers here. Did business with some like DavidSW, they were faultless. Just need to know the right method, which is to take the watch straightaway to RSC for assessment if you feel it needs to. If this thread enlightens that fact or any others, I am jolly good. |
|
7 September 2016, 01:30 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
|
Definitely an unfortunate situation.
Not all "trusted sellers" are equal, but it's tough in your specific case because assuming your story is true, too much time has passed. There is no way to verify what happened in those two years. It might not be reasonable to name the seller, but it's definitely a lesson for sellers and buyers. Watches should be opened and properly checked by both parties.
__________________
Rolex Datejust 41 126334 | Omega Speedmaster Professional Hesalite | Cartier Santos Large | Tudor Black Bay 58 |
7 September 2016, 01:51 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
|
Quote:
Its reasonable, forum needs to know issues like these, just not glowing tributes all the time saying "such and such transaction is gloriously wonderful".. Agree with other your comment "There is no way to verify what happened in those two years" |
|
7 September 2016, 02:05 PM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
|
Quote:
You're right. The problem here is time. A mod has asked who the seller is so let's see where this goes.
__________________
Rolex Datejust 41 126334 | Omega Speedmaster Professional Hesalite | Cartier Santos Large | Tudor Black Bay 58 |
|
7 September 2016, 01:32 PM | #23 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,507
|
So who is the seller?
|
8 September 2016, 12:56 AM | #24 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,558
|
|
8 September 2016, 09:53 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
|
|
7 September 2016, 01:44 PM | #26 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,093
|
16710 with a damaged case from a Trusted seller here
I'm not a dealer but have bought and sold several watches he and on eBay. Each one goes to a certified watchmaker to see if anything is amiss. Due diligence on my part since I flip watches a lot and would never pass something onward that might be a burden on another member here.
Trust but verify - and IMHO after 2 years it is not really fair to expect any seller to make up for shortcomings that could have been discovered with ordinary diligence.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
7 September 2016, 01:57 PM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
|
Quote:
|
|
7 September 2016, 01:49 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,821
|
16710 with a damaged case from a Trusted seller here
This situation really stinks. the seller should have checked out the watch before selling. Obviously this does not always happen and it's really the buyers responsibility to confirm everything is in good order. After two years no one should expect a return. It stinks... But it's not the sellers problem anymore.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
7 September 2016, 01:58 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: US
Posts: 422
|
I've always wondered about scenarios like this whenever purchasing used watches here.
Even though too much time has passed, if a well known seller, and if what you state is true, I would think it helps everyone here to know that this particular seller doesn't open and check thoroughly before reselling (perhaps even for those that bought from this seller around the same time). Although, practice may have changed since then. |
7 September 2016, 02:00 PM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 145
|
16710 with a damaged case from a Trusted seller here
I think you've already given enough info to identify the seller. If I am correct, his return policy also states that all watches are sold "as is."
If he didn't represent that it had been opened and the inside inspected or didn't post pictures of the inside of the watch in the listing, then my feeling is that is falls within "as is." While this is disappointing to learn, it's part of the risk of buying from a dealer other than an AD. One buying a watch has the opportunity to do their own inspection at receipt. If the buyer chooses not to, then they assume the risk. In any event, two years seems far too long to me to expect a different result out of the seller's general goodwill. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.