The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 June 2014, 12:24 AM   #1
Mack Bolan
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Anywhere but here
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 259
Looks Great In Pics..But Not in Person?

I know a lot of the time one must see a watch in person because pics can be misleading, but has anyone ever been disappointed by the watch in person after being thrilled by pics on internet?
Mack Bolan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 12:32 AM   #2
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,179
Have to admit I was a little less thrilled with the GMTIIC LN and BLNR in person than I expected. Both are beautiful watches, I would be OK with owning either, both sang to me but just not loudly. I had the completely opposite experience, however when I first saw the EXPII 216570 in person. Once again, all a matter of personal preference and taste.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 06:05 AM   #3
Nidal
"TRF" Member
 
Nidal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC LV
Posts: 1,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annan View Post
Have to admit I was a little less thrilled with the GMTIIC LN and BLNR in person than I expected. Both are beautiful watches, I would be OK with owning either, both sang to me but just not loudly. I had the completely opposite experience, however when I first saw the EXPII 216570 in person. Once again, all a matter of personal preference and taste.

Agree 100%. I sold my GMT2c less than a year later. The PCL and major bling effect with the ceramic busy bezel did it for me.
He exp 2 is clean, non blingy daily wearer.
Too much flash and bling in the new watches


Nidal
Nidal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 07:02 AM   #4
Nidal
"TRF" Member
 
Nidal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC LV
Posts: 1,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annan View Post
Have to admit I was a little less thrilled with the GMTIIC LN and BLNR in person than I expected. Both are beautiful watches, I would be OK with owning either, both sang to me but just not loudly. I had the completely opposite experience, however when I first saw the EXPII 216570 in person. Once again, all a matter of personal preference and taste.

I agree, I could never get over the shiny unpractical PCL and the flashy bezel of theGMT. My next watch will be a white explorer with brushed links. I have an lvc and a black SS Daytona


Nidal
Nidal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 12:35 AM   #5
viper9669
"TRF" Member
 
viper9669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
Looks Great In Pics..But Not in Person?

Yes, the white dial Milgauss, it looked very nice in promo pics. I considered buying one, then I saw it at the AD.
I guess different folks like different watches, which makes Rolex such an interesting brand to me.
viper9669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 06:41 PM   #6
osamu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by viper9669 View Post
Yes, the white dial Milgauss, it looked very nice in promo pics. I considered buying one, then I saw it at the AD.
I guess different folks like different watches, which makes Rolex such an interesting brand to me.
I felt the exact same way. I was looking for light dial, so was limited to like the white Milgauss and white Exp II. The white Milgauss just seemed..... not sure how else to explain it, but cheap. Funny thing is, I liked the bolt hand more than I thought I would and ended up with the GV.
osamu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 12:38 AM   #7
Mack Bolan
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Anywhere but here
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 259
What happened to me was I was amazed by the BLNR in many of the beautiful pics here on the forum...I went to AD and was ready to try on the BATMAN! When handed, I actually thought I was looking at the wrong watch...It was beautiful of course but it didn't have the BANG it does in close up pics..I guess that could be said for any watch really...

The opposite was true with the Sub C TT Bluesy - Pics were ok, depending on angle and sunlight etc...But then I saw it in person and I couldn't believe it...

Damn you HD pics!
Mack Bolan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 12:42 AM   #8
viper9669
"TRF" Member
 
viper9669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Bolan View Post
What happened to me was I was amazed by the BLNR in many of the beautiful pics here on the forum...I went to AD and was ready to try on the BATMAN! When handed, I actually thought I was looking at the wrong watch...It was beautiful of course but it didn't have the BANG it does in close up pics..I guess that could be said for any watch really...

Damn you HD pics!

I recently noticed there are different shades of blue on the BLNR bezels, some darker, some brighter blue. I must be hanging around ADs too often, under the same store lighting, 2 different shades of blue on 2 BLNRs.
viper9669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 12:44 AM   #9
BBQ BOY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 512
The Explorer.
BBQ BOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 06:02 AM   #10
Snow-Dweller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Snow-Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Bolan View Post
What happened to me was I was amazed by the BLNR in many of the beautiful pics here on the forum...I went to AD and was ready to try on the BATMAN! When handed, I actually thought I was looking at the wrong watch...It was beautiful of course but it didn't have the BANG it does in close up pics..I guess that could be said for any watch really...

The opposite was true with the Sub C TT Bluesy - Pics were ok, depending on angle and sunlight etc...But then I saw it in person and I couldn't believe it...

Damn you HD pics!
I wasn't impressed by the BLNR when I first saw it n the flesh.....then I fell in love with it.
__________________
.
The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings...
———————————————————————————————————

.
16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. BB58. GMW-B5000D.
Snow-Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 05:20 AM   #11
usmc93
"TRF" Member
 
usmc93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Brent
Location: Huntsvegas, AL
Watch: SS/Black Daytona
Posts: 1,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Bolan View Post
What happened to me was I was amazed by the BLNR in many of the beautiful pics here on the forum...I went to AD and was ready to try on the BATMAN! When handed, I actually thought I was looking at the wrong watch...
Agreed, had the same thing happen to me with the BLNR. Had the opposite happen to me with the Explorer II, I liked the Polar one better in pics, until I saw the Black one side by side at the AD, to me it was not competition, Black blew it out of the water.
__________________
"Some people live an entire lifetime and wonder if they have made a difference in the world. Marines don't have that problem." - Ronald Reagan

--Rolex 116610LV, Rolex 116710LN BLNR, Bremont MBII, Rolex 216570, Omega Speedmaster 3572.50, Zenith Class Elite 680, 1993 Tag Heuer 2000 Chrono--
usmc93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 12:51 AM   #12
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,305
The DJ2 blue dial looks amazing here but when I tried it on the blue was a bit dark and underwhelmed me a touch, altho I did try on the DD2 choco just before it so it's probably not a fair assessment. While the blue YM1 surprised me in reverse, just loved it in the ADs.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 12:55 AM   #13
Travelair007
"TRF" Member
 
Travelair007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 1,514
Travelair007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 12:56 AM   #14
Travelair007
"TRF" Member
 
Travelair007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 1,514
The same could be said about online dating...>!!

She said she was model....I didn't realize she was a model of a large watery mammal...


....hmmm...I feel guilty writing that yet...can't get myself to remove it....
Travelair007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 01:00 AM   #15
Vipes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,863
Good question/thread. Happens a lot for me. I like the BLNR but it did not sing to me (love it in pics though). I love some of the Grand Seikos but again did nothing for me when I tried it on.
Vipes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 09:14 PM   #16
ejvette
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
ejvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: East Hampton NY
Watch: me break clays..
Posts: 7,495

Quote:
Originally Posted by flagada2009 View Post
The same could be said about online dating...>!!

She said she was model....I didn't realize she was a model of a large watery mammal...


....hmmm...I feel guilty writing that yet...can't get myself to remove it....
__________________
Rolex•Omega•Breitling•Grand Seiko

"The only difference between crazy and eccentric is the size of ones bank account" Anonymous

* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *
ejvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 02:57 AM   #17
aaamax
"TRF" Member
 
aaamax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Sweden of yore
Posts: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by flagada2009 View Post
The same could be said about online dating...>!!

She said she was model....I didn't realize she was a model of a large watery mammal...


....hmmm...I feel guilty writing that yet...can't get myself to remove it....
I lost part of my drink out the nose with this! Lol.
aaamax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2014, 05:54 PM   #18
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by flagada2009 View Post
The same could be said about online dating...>!!

She said she was model....I didn't realize she was a model of a large watery mammal...


....hmmm...I feel guilty writing that yet...can't get myself to remove it....
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:42 PM   #19
TheDon2000
"TRF" Member
 
TheDon2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travelair007 View Post
The same could be said about online dating...>!!

She said she was model....I didn't realize she was a model of a large watery mammal...


....hmmm...I feel guilty writing that yet...can't get myself to remove it....
5 year old thread but since it's already been bumped, might as well bring this back to the top.
__________________
Racing | Watches | Boating
TheDon2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 12:59 AM   #20
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
yes
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 01:00 AM   #21
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
Yes all the Maxi Dials. Way too much for me.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 01:08 AM   #22
wantonebad
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
wantonebad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,843
Happened to me with the Omega Bumble Bee, loved the idea of the non ferrous movement and also loved the look of AT case and yellow striped second hand, but it person, not the looker I had hoped for...
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal...
on a fairly irrelevant social media site
that falsely inflates my fragile ego"
wantonebad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 01:09 AM   #23
mjm800
"TRF" Member
 
mjm800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Bolan View Post
I know a lot of the time one must see a watch in person because pics can be misleading, but has anyone ever been disappointed by the watch in person after being thrilled by pics on internet?
I'll take flak for this...but, the Hulk looked so amazing in the prerelease photos and when I saw it, it was just OK to me.
__________________
http://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=39890&dateline=128330  1854
mjm800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 01:37 AM   #24
sierra11b
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjm800 View Post
I'll take flak for this...but, the Hulk looked so amazing in the prerelease photos and when I saw it, it was just OK to me.
Same here but part of the let down was that the gumby green bezel matches identically to the corporation logo I work for. Didn't want to be reminded of work everytime I wore it.

Others that left me cold were the Explorers (not the Exp42) and the black and white Milgauss.
sierra11b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:33 AM   #25
bighaole
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Exp II + Daytona
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjm800 View Post
I'll take flak for this...but, the Hulk looked so amazing in the prerelease photos and when I saw it, it was just OK to me.
+1. I was interested in the hulk from pictures, but in person, at an AD, it was just too much, for me.
bighaole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2014, 11:43 AM   #26
jnkay
"TRF" Member
 
jnkay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Florida, US
Watch: du jour
Posts: 1,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by bighaole View Post
+1. I was interested in the hulk from pictures, but in person, at an ad, it was just too much, for me.
x2
jnkay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 01:14 AM   #27
Baselman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 1665 GreatWhite SD
Posts: 1,527
The platinum daytona looks really great in pics but in person totally different story it looks even better!!
Baselman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 05:05 AM   #28
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baselman View Post
The platinum daytona looks really great in pics but in person totally different story it looks even better!!

man beat me to that one
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 01:49 AM   #29
malarky_hk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: ...
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,466
The BLNR.
malarky_hk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2014, 02:15 AM   #30
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,856
The 40mm polar Exp II did that to me. I went in ready to buy after years for drooling and it just felt small in person. I've seen the new 42mm IRL and love it!
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.