![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
|
Name a better dive watch under $3,000...
This is my 14060 (A). Circa 1999. I love it for all the traits and qualities we have often discussed.
I am always looking to add a diver and always compare the price, value, appeal, and resale against this one. I challenge all my friends here - name a better dive watch - any brand for $3,000 or less. Russ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: --
Posts: 2,097
|
Hmmm I'm extremely hard pressed there, and would have to resort to the usual two: The PO and the SMP (Omegas)
I personally prefer the sub to them, and think that the design is better; but some Omega expert could come in and start making a case! The 14060 (Non COSC) is a masterpiece though: Lug holes, uncluttered dial, normal dial and hands, timeless case, and 300m water resistance. What's there not to love? The 14060 is truly king, even in the below 5k diver category! |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: SK
Location: Greenland
Watch: Various SUBs
Posts: 473
|
Quote:
It's like that!! ![]() ![]()
__________________
Founder and CEO of the "BLUME" Club Rolex ref: 14060 - 92', 16600- 06', 116610LN 11' In Da House!! ![]() He who only loves one woman and one watch, doesn't truly love women or watches!! ![]() "Not all that is countable, counts; and not all that counts, is countable" ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
The Seamasters, Planet Oceans, or maybe a Breitling Superocean would be the biggest competition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,683
|
you asked, right? : )
what's your criteria? resale? rolex will win. if you're looking at history and being one of the first automatic dive watches as well as having an inhouse movement, then the nd sub will win many a contest. if you're looking at legibility, lume, depth rating, bracelet quality, and timekeeping, there are many watches that are equal if not better. just go to the dive watch forum on WUS, and there will be many brands/watches (most people here have never heard of) that are superior to the sub. UTS is one example. but, if you want a big higher end name, then the Omega Planet Ocean. After having owned the Sub No Date, I think the Planet Ocean is superior on many levels. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
The Rolex Sub is a classic with an unimpeachable name and history. HOWEVER, if you look outside of the big names and drop down to the sub $1500 mark, there is an almost bewildering number of micro-brands out there who are knocking out some fantastic, affordable, dive watches. Just check out the likes of Zixen, Benarus, Bathys and Kazimon for a taste. Check out the WUS dive forum for a taste, but don't stay there too long or you may end up with another handful of watches on the wishlist ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
Hey, what about Invicta?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
|
You poke fun, but IF (and that can be a big if) you can get a well-made Invicta they can be pretty hard to beat for the $.
__________________
Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown... |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: US
Posts: 468
|
Amen
__________________
The safest place for Your Rolex is on Your wrist 2002 Rolex Submariner 14060 1963 Omega Automatic LL6304 1953 Wittnauer Revue 2009 Swiss Army Divemaster 500 |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Hmmm. . .
IMO, the Omega 2254.50 exceeds the the Sub in every category; i.e., movement, dial legibility, lume, fit, finish, bracelet: ![]() The demand for this classic has pushed the re-sale prices up. Several years ago, I paid <$1500 for this one BNIB from an AD. Today, pre-owned prices exceed my purchase price. The same goes for the "electric blue" Omega 2255.80: ![]() I bought both BNIB for less than the price of one Sub. Fr. John† |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
|
Korsbek makes a beefy watch. I didn't like how it felt on my wrist, but heavy duty.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GMT-8
Watch: 14060M, 116520
Posts: 153
|
Seiko Divers Automatic 200m is a very nice watch, around $250, several configurations. I don't know your criteria for "better" so it may not be what you are looking for. I don't consider it better than your Rolex but it's a good daily wearer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Satheesh
Location: Sunnyvale, ca
Watch: SS/Plat YM
Posts: 52
|
Since there are quite a few Rado fans out here, I think this might just win. Rado divers watch, 1 customer review 5*
http://www.amazon.com/Rado-Original-.../dp/B000Y01RUS Product Description Stainless steel case and bracelet. Black dial with luminous green accents and indexes. Hard metal bezel. Sapphire crystal. 2 screw-down crowns with crown protection. Screw-down steel case back with Rado's stamped 'Seahorses' medallion. Turning diving bezel. Case size: 38.6mm x 46.2mm. Automatic movement. Water resistant at 300 meters (1000 feet). Rado Original Diver Mens Watch R12639013 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 526
|
DOXA, SEIKO MM300, UTS, and bigger size watches and dirt cheap brands from wilsonwatchworks, DWATCH, helson and so on...
as you can tell, Rolex is most recognized watch out their but their are many others that gets the job done for lesser money. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,415
|
Quote:
I own several Subs and love them all. But I must say I am really loving my new Sinn. Is it a better Dive watch you be the judge.For the money (under $1500) Its a great Dive watch
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
I agree with Nikos. If I where a professional diver, and my requirement was an automatic diver's watch I'd go with a Sinn. They are today what Rolex once was. Just check their use of technology out.
Best, A |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 54
|
the Sinn U-series divers are very nice divers and i wouldn't have any problem wearing one if i were a profesional diver, but there are some differences in the level of finishing,etc that separates them with the Rolex divers. it really depends on what features, etc are most important to you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Watch: DSSD, Omega SMP
Posts: 3,055
|
I would say an Omega SMP, or definitely a PO, is just as good as a Sub. But lets not start the whole Omega vs. Rolex again lol
|
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
|
THe way your question is worded, you will get hammered by tons of models from tons of companies ....
Seiko would rip Rolex to shreds, pound for pound .... Seiko is the best value for the $$ ... what your 14060M can do, so can some Seiko divers under $300.... Rolex is a brand name my friend.....quality yes but a brand name .... Apart from the SD and the DSSD, most other company divers would clobber Rolex divers... Invicta is another one .... |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
|
I actually enjoy every brand mentioned. Of course Rolex makes a great watch, but there are plenty of other watches that handle business too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Benbrook, TX
Posts: 410
|
You asked, so here's my opinion!
The Omega SMP is a far better watch for the money, since that's how you are framing this question. I got my SMP brand-new for about $1500, which is half of the number you stated. It has better lume, has a date, and keeps better time (COSC spec'd). I may be a Rolex owner, but I also think the SMP is one of the best bang-for-the buck watches of all time. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
|
Well done everyone
![]() Re Seikos, Invictas, Rados, Sinns, Omegas, etc. Do you TRULY look at any of these 25 times a day without needing to know the time? Do any of those give you that "feeling" that your Rolex does? Do you spend many hours a week on the Seiko, Invicta, Sinn, etc forum? Here is my biggest differentiator - have you ever sold a Rolex so you could buy one of those??? keep em coming ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
|
Quote:
Just like a Honda accord will go anywhere a Ferrari will go, the accord does not have that WOW factor and it does not elicit that response frrom onlookers or buyers .... so same goes with the way your question was worded.... what we are paying for is intrinsic value when we buy the Rolex ... we're not buying the watch, instead buying how the watch makes us feel... But an ordinary seiko diver will do just as well as a submariner technically.... Apart from the DEEP SEA, I believe the invictas and seikos and other low end brands will embarass most Rolex divers when it comes to underwater performance and even out of water, daily performance.....or do just as good ....and they do .... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Benbrook, TX
Posts: 410
|
Quote:
http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/se...r/bluesmp.html |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 54
|
to answer your questions:
Do you TRULY look at any of these 25 times a day without needing to know the time? Yes, though I don't think I've ever looked at any watch 25X a day. Do any of those give you that "feeling" that your Rolex does? Sure, plenty. Do you spend many hours a week on the Seiko, Invicta, Sinn, etc forum? Yes, I happen to spend much more time reading and participating in the non-Rolex forums Have you ever sold a Rolex so you could buy one of those??? I've never had to sell a watch to buy a Rolex, but I certainly have watches that I would elect to keep over my Rolexes if I needed to sell or liquidate. I like my Rolexes but there are some other pieces that get more love. any other questions? ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,683
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.