|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: 14060M vs 114060 | |||
| 14060M |
   
|
294 | 48.92% |
| 114060 |
  
|
307 | 51.08% |
| Voters: 601. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
8 February 2014, 12:07 AM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 373
|
14060M vs 114060
Ok fellas, do you prefer the classic sub or the new ceramic one?
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 12:10 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
|
I've tried on both side by side- it's a draw, each with their own benefits.
The older case size subs are my still my preference ..
__________________
-NAWCC Member |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 12:36 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
The answer is simple
 114060! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most' |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 12:37 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Definitely the older model - with the non COSC dial!
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 12:55 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
The latest was my choice.
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 01:28 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,571
|
Not a fan of any ceramic insert watch and not too keen on the new style case so my choice would be the 14060 or 14060M.
__________________
 ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder 
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 01:33 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
The older, the better...........
__________________
Best Regards, Jason  Just Say "NO" to Polishing  Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 01:37 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
I've voted for this beauty:
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 02:07 AM
|
#9 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DerekISeric
Location: FurtherOnUpTheRd.
Watch: yourself
Posts: 1,640
|
I prefer the classic style 14060 or 14060M. Better looking case, dial, and non-ceramic bezel...along with lug holes - - make it a no brainer.
Also, for those with smaller wrists - personally I did not like the way the SubC fit or looked. 14060 is much more comfortable.
__________________
. . .  Eric |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 03:25 AM
|
#10 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA
Watch: 16710
Posts: 65
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 02:45 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: George
Location: NYC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 03:20 AM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: London
Posts: 45
|
I think those old subs represent great value for money! Having said that I did try the new one and it felt good. especially the bracelet with sel... Go old skool and be a bit different!
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 03:23 AM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
Oh boy, I feel like I see this same thread every day.
114060 is my choice, though. |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 03:31 AM
|
#14 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 03:59 AM
|
#15 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,879
|
Very different models.
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 10:48 AM
|
#16 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Rolex Air-King
Posts: 4,468
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram: timeonhand1010 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 04:01 AM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
Both are nice but I prefer the 14060m.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le gιnιral de l'armιe de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - Andrι Fortin |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 04:03 AM
|
#18 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
unless some kinda vintage guy, why not get the newest model with the most updates
the ceramic bezel is better, the lume is better, the case is better, the clasp is better not sure why you would get an older model if you can afford the newer one as Mike says very different models as you can see this is my opinion and I am not a vintage guy |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 04:09 AM
|
#19 | |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DerekISeric
Location: FurtherOnUpTheRd.
Watch: yourself
Posts: 1,640
|
Quote:
Steel vs. Ceramic has been discussed ad nauseum - so I won't even touch it. Though the maxi-dial clutters up the watch - IMHO.
__________________
. . . Eric |
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 04:21 AM
|
#20 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Quote:
if you ever see them both posted together the new one looks significantly beefier which I like and others don't so just pointing out a difference and should have mentioned maxi dial thanks, also love that improvement! as you don't ya must be old school just like lug holes, people love em, I have watches with them, personally I don't like them I think the OP original question was to address what one and why so mostly pointing out the differences and letting him make up his mind is a good plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 04:05 AM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
I like both of these models but the 114060 gets my vote because of the glidelock clasp. The glidelock clasp might just be the greatest invention EVER.
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 04:17 AM
|
#22 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,097
|
the one with lugholes
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 04:36 AM
|
#23 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,683
|
114060 by leaps and bounds. Everyone talks about the upgrades, bezel, bracelet, maxi-dial and case...and their preferences for one over another based on those criteria.
I just like the fact that the glare on the dial face is significantly less on the 114060. |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 04:44 AM
|
#24 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Arlington, Va
Watch: ALL OF THEM
Posts: 1,705
|
Definitely applaud the improvements but in this case, gotta go classic. Nothing better on a NATO than a solid two liner.
__________________
It is better to lead from behind and to put others in front, especially when you celebrate victory when nice things occur. You take the front line when there is danger. Then people will appreciate your leadership. Rolex 114060 Omega SMP 2531.80 Vintage Omega - no idea but dad's watch |
|
|
|
|
7 April 2014, 02:19 PM
|
#25 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 05:21 AM
|
#26 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Phila
Watch: Subc 116610
Posts: 392
|
Definitely love the upgrades on the Ceramic version, especially the bracelet. Most do not approve the changes to the case though. Ideally, 114060 on bracelet and 14060 (lug holes) on NATO or a nice vintage leather.
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 10:43 AM
|
#27 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,430
|
114060.
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 11:06 AM
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Edmond
Location: Michigan
Watch: 114060/116334
Posts: 737
|
Ceramic all day for me!
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 11:20 AM
|
#29 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Ceramic for me.
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2014, 11:34 AM
|
#30 |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 71,873
|
Old school for me!
__________________
 Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron  P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
