ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: What do you do with your SUB , SD or SSDS ? | |||
Don't even want to get it wet | 39 | 21.08% | |
Swimming pool | 36 | 19.46% | |
Beach / sea ( salt water ) | 49 | 26.49% | |
Recreational dives up to 30m | 50 | 27.03% | |
Professional divers civilian / armed forces | 11 | 5.95% | |
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
23 October 2009, 03:26 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
|
Do SUB, SD and SDDS owners dive ?
I would like to launch this post to find out who of us SUB , SD and SDDS ( myself) owners actually take them further then the swimming pool .
|
23 October 2009, 03:54 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,007
|
SUB to 60 feet (deepest for me so far anyways)
|
23 October 2009, 03:56 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
|
Interesting question, I'll be interested to see how people respond. For me, I love the design and water heritage of the Rolex dive watches and do a lot of water sports - surfing, small boat sailing, wakeboarding, etc. - but generally stick with my Timex Ironman when there's a good chance of the watch getting dinged.
I know SD and Sub are designed for the water but personally I'd prefer to use a cheaper watch for active water sports, especially since I have a previous watch or two currently sitting at the bottom of the ocean! |
23 October 2009, 04:03 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Falls Church, Va.
Watch: 16610
Posts: 42
|
I've taken mine diving down to about 45 feet, not because I was scared to take it further, but because that's where the bottom was on those dives. I took the 16610, in part, because I wanted to be able to say that I had actually used it for it's intended purpose and that it's not just a piece of "jewelry" or a fashion statement. I may take it again the next time that the opportunity comes up.
|
23 October 2009, 04:05 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,471
|
ha ha most people don't even want to get there wacth wet, i am with you guys on that one!
|
23 October 2009, 04:09 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
YMCA certified since 1990. I didn't own my Rolex then but I have made a few dives with it since I received it in 93'. Nothing in salt water though, only fresh water dives. Here is a link to the lake I made my first open water dive for certification.
http://www.francepark.com/scuba.htm This is where I would like to go next. http://www.divegilboa.com/ |
23 October 2009, 04:43 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: Virginia
Watch: 14060M / 16613
Posts: 141
|
I haven't gone scuba diving since owning my sub, but I plan to the next chance I get. It would be a lot of fun to take shots of my sub nestled into the bodice of some cool coral.
__________________
Four-wheel drive pickup I remember his last words: Hold my beer, watch this! |
23 October 2009, 04:51 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 459
|
While I live in a tropical paradise South Beach is 30 minutes away, the Florida Keys are 45 minutes away. I dont take my watches in the water with me Rolex or other wise unless I was going in under air, which I don't... I own a pool and still no watch goes in with me, Don't want to scratch it
|
23 October 2009, 04:53 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 167
|
I do a lot of cold water diving, and I use my Seiko diver the most - the bezel is easier to operate with gloves on. I have taken my 14060M on several dives in Mexico, however.
__________________
GMT Master II 16760 Submariner 14060M |
1 December 2009, 11:19 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Kentucky
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
The thinner bezel on the Seadweller and Sub are very hard to grip with neoprene gloves on. However, they are still very dive-worthy and I would not be afraid to use them for their intended purpose. Warm water diving (glove-less or with thin gloves on) would be ideal for them. Also, I picked up my Seikos for less than $200 each, so if they get banged against a tank, knocked against the side of a pitching boat, or scraped across sand and coral it's not going to ruin my day!
__________________
"I get clock radio...he cannot afford. High five!" |
|
2 December 2009, 01:13 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: NC
Watch: A Rolex or two
Posts: 952
|
I was a US Navy diver in a former life, but never used a Rolex. The dive watch of choice was a G-Shock for most (we issued them to the divers), or one of the differnt Citizen Aqualand watches. You hardly ever saw anybody wearing an expensive watch on the dive side, as there were simply too many things that could destroy it.
Every unit member (Mobil Diving and Salvage Unit, or MDSU) was expected to hump gear and help in any and all ways, regardless of whether you were an officer or enlisted. We ran off more than one doctor this way...they didn't like carrying tanks. The pics below are one of the last ops I participated in before getting out in 2006. These pics were taken on a salvage operation in Alaska, in July. I'm diving in a hot water suit, wearing a MK21 helmet (or a Superlight 17, as it's called in the commercial diving community). Depths were less than 110 feet, and all complete on regular gas (no mixes). We spent two weeks up there on this operation, and completed just under 200 dives, including a handful on SCUBA. Here's the view from the dive barge: All set up and ready to start: Getting hatted up: Getting ready to jump in the drink...the water temp was about 38 degrees, and about 35 at 100 feet: With my buddy, ready to descend: Getting ready for another dive:
__________________
Deep Sea A few Rolex & a Tudor Sub An Omega & a bunch of Breitling |
23 October 2009, 05:01 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: David
Location: Sandy Springs, Ga
Watch: GMT II, new Subbie
Posts: 937
|
I dive with both my Sub Date and my GMT-II since it's rated to 330 ft. and the deepest I've gone is 200 ft. Cannot understand the weenies that are afraid to get their watches wet. The watches shrug 200 ft. off as kids play. No issues with either watch. Actually Rolex tests their watches to +10% over the stated depth rating, so my GMT II is good for 363 feet.
Go out and get wet!!! |
23 October 2009, 05:45 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: 4Q
Location: Nowhere near you
Watch: 169622, 124060
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
That's all I'm going to say about slave to fashion, jewellery wearing, suit accessorizing scared to get a water mark on their safe-dweller knobs.
__________________
One should endeavor to do what is right not what is established. |
|
23 October 2009, 05:48 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 64
|
|
23 October 2009, 05:56 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
|
Well to each their own in when to wear Rolex, another kind of watch or no watch at all . . . for me the thing that causes me to leave the SD at home is not water resistance, it's impact . . . I have lost a few watches due to impact with surfboards, sailboat masts when the boat is capsizing, etc. and just don't care to have a Rolex sitting on the ocean floor.
|
23 October 2009, 07:02 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
|
30 November 2009, 08:31 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: USA
Watch: the skies
Posts: 1,250
|
My brother just bought a DRSD and dives extensively all over the world with his. I certainly would have no hesitation if it passed pressure testings, which I imagine it would. My own red sub has been on many ocean and sky dives. That's what they were made for and I wear it because of that toughness.
But then I own my watch. It doesn't own me. |
23 October 2009, 05:35 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
not afraid of getting the watch wet. Just never used to wearing one for any water related activities/sports
|
23 October 2009, 05:51 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I am a swimmer, but do not dive. If I did, I would have no hesitation in wearing my SD or one of my Subs.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
23 October 2009, 06:00 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
My 16610 has been snorkeling in Honolulu, swimming in the pool, as well as the Atlantic ocean. No issues. I'm not a diver but I'd WELCOME the chance to take it diving if I was!
|
23 October 2009, 06:29 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 400
|
Beach and swimming pools for me. I have a few other watches rated at 100M, but sub just looks better in the water.
|
23 October 2009, 06:43 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Chris
Location: KS, USA
Watch: SS GMT IIc
Posts: 89
|
Have to agree with David and Sheldon on this one.
Don't see the point of owning a DSSD just for the look. |
23 October 2009, 07:05 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: S.F. Peninsula
Watch: what you say!
Posts: 815
|
Haven't been to the beach or a pool since I got the DSSD, but my GMTII before it went everywhere. I don't dive, but I like to swim and I don't see any reason to leave a Rolex behind.
|
23 October 2009, 10:52 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fl.
Posts: 521
|
I don't have a Rolex Sub, but I have a Tudor Submariner that I use for Scuba diving.
|
23 October 2009, 11:17 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Lee
Location: USA
Posts: 2,834
|
|
23 October 2009, 12:14 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: VK2 - AUS
Watch: 5513s
Posts: 7,380
|
Recreational dives generally to around 15-20 m, 33m deepest so far. Occasional diving at work but only really shallow at 5m.
Before I got my sub I used to dive with my 1984 DJ 16030. I cannot believe the so far 13 votes for "Don't even want to get it wet" these are the ultimate diving tool watch for crying out loud, diving is exactly what they are made for..... |
23 October 2009, 12:21 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
I take it off when I wash my hands!
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland |
23 October 2009, 12:42 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Colin Leask.
Location: Scotland, UK.
Watch: 118238 YG DD.
Posts: 723
|
Myself and my better-half go diving every spring in the Red Sea, Egypt.
The water is lovely and the Blue Sub looks even better!! |
23 October 2009, 01:26 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: David
Location: Sandy Springs, Ga
Watch: GMT II, new Subbie
Posts: 937
|
|
23 October 2009, 02:58 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.