ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Hank · 9 August 2013, 06:26 PM

Hi All,

I'm having a difficult time trying to choose between a PAM 372 and a PAM 183. I am well aware that these are two very different watches and in different price points.

I currently own a Rolex Deep Sea and an IWC Portuguese 7 Day (5001). I used to own a PAM 177 (ti) but sold it to fund the purchase of my IWC. Not soon after, I realized I need a Panerai to complete my humble collection.

I think the 372 is a beautiful piece but not as versatile as the 183 due to it's size and style. I am not so concerned about the technical aspects of the watches but more on the aesthetics. That said, I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts on this matter.

travisb · 9 August 2013, 08:51 PM

As far as aesthetics, it doesn't get much cleaner and balanced than the 372 dial. Add an in-house 3 day manual movement and there's your winner.

kilyung · 9 August 2013, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

... the 372 is a beautiful piece but not as versatile as the 183 due to it's size and style...

Sounds like you've already decided. Personally I'd go 372 over 183 after having owned both. Congrats either way.

jvo300 · 10 August 2013, 12:15 AM

Size and fit trumps all. Go with the 183 if that works better for your wrist.

mborkow · 10 August 2013, 12:16 AM

Between those two models, I don't think you can make a bad decision. Personally, I was in the market for a base rad when the 372 caught my eye. Either way, I am sure you'll be happy.

arizonaboy · 10 August 2013, 12:27 AM

I love both, but I think the 372 wins out when it comes to style...its a head-turner with the right amount of Panerai DNA.

arizonaboy · 10 August 2013, 12:28 AM

I love both, but I think the 372 wins out when it comes to style...its a head-turner with the right mix of Panerai DNA.

apeogre · 10 August 2013, 01:07 AM

I like the 183 for daily wearability and size. The 47mm 372 is certainly doable, but it's still a big watch.

Hank · 10 August 2013, 02:52 AM

thanks guys. for those of you who have or had the 372, can you dress up in one? i'm in a suit 5 days out of the week and i'm curious whether or not i can wear it to a business meeting or a formal occassion. i'm thinking this is more of a weekend watch? any and all pics of this watch in a formal attire would be appreciated.

Friedl41 · 10 August 2013, 03:01 AM

I wear a suit, too. Every day of the week. I do like the 372 on a asso strap, with a 22 buckle ... I think the 26/22 straps make it look better with a suit ... For the weekend i wear it on a 26/26 strap i.e. wotancraft 74 or Mario Paci Olterra ... I even use my 26/22 OEM rubber strap for work ...

I would get both watches ... I have 210 which i love .... But with the heat in Madrid over the last weeks ... I was wearing my GMT Master most of the time ....

Hank · 10 August 2013, 04:58 AM

Friedl41,

I would love to see some photos of your 372 on some of the straps you mentioned. I'm not very familiar with the straps you're referring too. Thanks in advance.

nick c · 10 August 2013, 05:11 AM

372 for sure

iLLGT2 · 10 August 2013, 05:30 AM

372 hands down

Hank · 10 August 2013, 06:20 AM

IMG_1315 (600x800).jpg

IMG_1317 (600x800).jpg

is the 372 too big for my wrist? is the 183 a better fit?

Hank · 10 August 2013, 06:36 AM

here are wrist shots of my 42mm IWC Portuguese and 44mm Rolex DSSD as reference.

Friedl41 · 10 August 2013, 08:10 AM

372 looks good. If you want the dressy look you always have the IWC

Hank · 10 August 2013, 02:27 PM

what do you think of the 232 vs the 372? i found a second hand one in mint condition. which one do you think is better overall in terms of looks, wearability and resales value?

Friedl41 · 10 August 2013, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

what do you think of the 232 vs the 372? i found a second hand one in mint condition. which one do you think is better overall in terms of looks, wearability and resales value?

Now you are changing the game. 327 over 183 but 232 over 372 ...

So my order:
1) 232
2) 372
3) 183

Hank · 10 August 2013, 04:57 PM

thanks DiverAsia. the 372 looks really chic with slacks and dress shirt.

Hairdude1 · 10 August 2013, 02:31 PM

I love my 372, this is my first PAM so I might be a little biased

DiverAsia · 10 August 2013, 04:12 PM

Kinda dressed up.

Hank · 10 August 2013, 05:06 PM

Friedl41,

may i ask why you prefer the 232 over te 372? is it because this model is discontinued and more rare?

Friedl41 · 11 August 2013, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

Friedl41,

may i ask why you prefer the 232 over te 372? is it because this model is discontinued and more rare?

Yes, for this reasons and because it is a Radomir which looks very much like the original ones ... I really like my 210, but the 232 with the golden hands and then2 lines on top i would like better .... The 372 you can get later ...

If money and limited and discontinued would be not the question ... I would choose the 372 ... It is one of the most beautiful watches made.

Pure. Clean. Special. I love mine.

kilyung · 10 August 2013, 10:58 PM

The 232 is a nice clean look. Do you prefer Radiomirs or Luminors?

HL65 · 11 August 2013, 12:01 PM

372

red1108nyc · 11 August 2013, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

Hi All,

I'm having a difficult time trying to choose between a PAM 372 and a PAM 183. I am well aware that these are two very different watches and in different price points.

I currently own a Rolex Deep Sea and an IWC Portuguese 7 Day (5001). I used to own a PAM 177 (ti) but sold it to fund the purchase of my IWC. Not soon after, I realized I need a Panerai to complete my humble collection.

I think the 372 is a beautiful piece but not as versatile as the 183 due to it's size and style. I am not so concerned about the technical aspects of the watches but more on the aesthetics. That said, I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts on this matter.

Where is Nishant?

TswaneNguni · 11 August 2013, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

Hi All,

I'm having a difficult time trying to choose between a PAM 372 and a PAM 183. I am well aware that these are two very different watches and in different price points.

I currently own a Rolex Deep Sea and an IWC Portuguese 7 Day (5001). I used to own a PAM 177 (ti) but sold it to fund the purchase of my IWC. Not soon after, I realized I need a Panerai to complete my humble collection.

I think the 372 is a beautiful piece but not as versatile as the 183 due to it's size and style. I am not so concerned about the technical aspects of the watches but more on the aesthetics. That said, I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts on this matter.

IMO,no question...372 it is !!

Hank · 11 August 2013, 05:43 PM

thank you all for your feedbacks. very insightful. i have decided to get the 372. i should get it within 2 weeks. i'll post some pics when i do.

travisb · 11 August 2013, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

thank you all for your feedbacks. very insightful. i have decided to get the 372. i should get it within 2 weeks. i'll post some pics when i do.

Congrats!

TSW · 11 August 2013, 06:26 PM

372 for me!

9 August 2013, 06:26 PM	#1
Hank "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Shanghai Posts: 1,630	PAM 372 vs 183 Hi All, I'm having a difficult time trying to choose between a PAM 372 and a PAM 183. I am well aware that these are two very different watches and in different price points. I currently own a Rolex Deep Sea and an IWC Portuguese 7 Day (5001). I used to own a PAM 177 (ti) but sold it to fund the purchase of my IWC. Not soon after, I realized I need a Panerai to complete my humble collection. I think the 372 is a beautiful piece but not as versatile as the 183 due to it's size and style. I am not so concerned about the technical aspects of the watches but more on the aesthetics. That said, I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts on this matter.

10 August 2013, 03:01 AM	#10
Friedl41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: SLF41 Location: Spain Watch: Changes Posts: 1,053	I wear a suit, too. Every day of the week. I do like the 372 on a asso strap, with a 22 buckle ... I think the 26/22 straps make it look better with a suit ... For the weekend i wear it on a 26/26 strap i.e. wotancraft 74 or Mario Paci Olterra ... I even use my 26/22 OEM rubber strap for work ... I would get both watches ... I have 210 which i love .... But with the heat in Madrid over the last weeks ... I was wearing my GMT Master most of the time .... __________________ Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a

10 August 2013, 08:10 AM	#16
Friedl41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: SLF41 Location: Spain Watch: Changes Posts: 1,053	372 looks good. If you want the dressy look you always have the IWC __________________ Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a

11 August 2013, 12:01 PM	#25
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,497	372 __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

11 August 2013, 06:26 PM	#30
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	372 for me! __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

9 August 2013, 08:51 PM	#2
travisb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 32,458	As far as aesthetics, it doesn't get much cleaner and balanced than the 372 dial. Add an in-house 3 day manual movement and there's your winner.

10 August 2013, 12:15 AM	#4
jvo300 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: TX Posts: 1,897	Size and fit trumps all. Go with the 183 if that works better for your wrist.

10 August 2013, 12:16 AM	#5
mborkow "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: san francisco Watch: gmt2c pam372 Posts: 842	Between those two models, I don't think you can make a bad decision. Personally, I was in the market for a base rad when the 372 caught my eye. Either way, I am sure you'll be happy.

10 August 2013, 12:27 AM	#6
arizonaboy "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Scottsdale Watch: Panerai 233 & DJII Posts: 145	I love both, but I think the 372 wins out when it comes to style...its a head-turner with the right amount of Panerai DNA.

10 August 2013, 12:28 AM	#7
arizonaboy "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Scottsdale Watch: Panerai 233 & DJII Posts: 145	I love both, but I think the 372 wins out when it comes to style...its a head-turner with the right mix of Panerai DNA.

10 August 2013, 01:07 AM	#8
apeogre "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: No Clue Posts: 586	I like the 183 for daily wearability and size. The 47mm 372 is certainly doable, but it's still a big watch.

10 August 2013, 02:52 AM	#9
Hank "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Shanghai Posts: 1,630	thanks guys. for those of you who have or had the 372, can you dress up in one? i'm in a suit 5 days out of the week and i'm curious whether or not i can wear it to a business meeting or a formal occassion. i'm thinking this is more of a weekend watch? any and all pics of this watch in a formal attire would be appreciated.

10 August 2013, 04:58 AM	#11
Hank "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Shanghai Posts: 1,630	Friedl41, I would love to see some photos of your 372 on some of the straps you mentioned. I'm not very familiar with the straps you're referring too. Thanks in advance.

10 August 2013, 05:11 AM	#12
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	372 for sure

10 August 2013, 05:30 AM	#13
iLLGT2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Martin Location: NY And FLA Watch: AP ROO Blue Scuba Posts: 2,694	372 hands down

10 August 2013, 06:20 AM	#14
Hank "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Shanghai Posts: 1,630	IMG_1315 (600x800).jpg IMG_1317 (600x800).jpg is the 372 too big for my wrist? is the 183 a better fit?

10 August 2013, 04:57 PM	#19
Hank "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Shanghai Posts: 1,630	thanks DiverAsia. the 372 looks really chic with slacks and dress shirt.

10 August 2013, 02:31 PM	#20
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	I love my 372, this is my first PAM so I might be a little biased

10 August 2013, 05:06 PM	#22
Hank "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Shanghai Posts: 1,630	Friedl41, may i ask why you prefer the 232 over te 372? is it because this model is discontinued and more rare?

10 August 2013, 10:58 PM	#24
kilyung 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,873	The 232 is a nice clean look. Do you prefer Radiomirs or Luminors?

11 August 2013, 05:43 PM	#28
Hank "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Shanghai Posts: 1,630	thank you all for your feedbacks. very insightful. i have decided to get the 372. i should get it within 2 weeks. i'll post some pics when i do.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)