The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 December 2021, 08:16 AM   #1
MichelleP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area
Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial
Posts: 4,169
New Sub question

I am waiting on a Submariner, 124060 or 126610LN. I currently have the previous iteration (Hulk). I have a 6.5" wrist and do like larger watches. My question is with the clasp. Does anyone feel the width of the new clasp is uncomfortable? I have tried on an exhibition one only and not sized of course so difficult to tell how the clasp will feel.
MichelleP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 08:25 AM   #2
rkny
"TRF" Member
 
rkny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC at heart
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichelleP View Post
I am waiting on a Submariner, 124060 or 126610LN. I currently have the previous iteration (Hulk). I have a 6.5" wrist and do like larger watches. My question is with the clasp. Does anyone feel the width of the new clasp is uncomfortable? I have tried on an exhibition one only and not size of course so difficult to tell how the clasp will feel.
The bracelet and clasp of my 124060 is one of the most comfortable bracelets I’ve owned. I previously had a 116610 and occasionally felt it was a bit watch-heavy, visually and physically, due to the taper at the clasp and the chunky lugs.

The slightly wider bracelet of 124060 distributes the weight of the watch a bit better.

It’s so comfortable that, now that it’s sweater weather, I’ve caught myself forgetting I had it on, tucked away under a sleeve.
rkny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 08:25 AM   #3
jgottsman11
2024 Pledge Member
 
jgottsman11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: JG
Location: San Antonio, TX
Watch: President
Posts: 1,311
Hi Michelle, I got the call for my 126610 yesterday in fact. The clasp was something I was worried about with my 6.5-6.75 inch wrist.

I am more than content with how it fits as a whole and the clasp has not been a bother whatsoever.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2727.jpg (118.2 KB, 1004 views)
__________________
5164R Aquanaut
228235 Olive Day Date
18238 Champagne Day Date
jgottsman11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 08:26 AM   #4
Heater3000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Florida
Posts: 77
I had the 126610 and sold it. Couldn’t get past the uncomfortable feeling of the large clasp
Heater3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 08:27 AM   #5
jgottsman11
2024 Pledge Member
 
jgottsman11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: JG
Location: San Antonio, TX
Watch: President
Posts: 1,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heater3000 View Post
I had the 126610 and sold it. Couldn’t get past the uncomfortable feeling of the large clasp
Interesting to hear. I don't even notice it while wearing it.
__________________
5164R Aquanaut
228235 Olive Day Date
18238 Champagne Day Date
jgottsman11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2021, 12:04 AM   #6
Nairn1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heater3000 View Post
I had the 126610 and sold it. Couldn’t get past the uncomfortable feeling of the large clasp
I can agree with this comment.
Nairn1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2021, 12:24 AM   #7
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
7.9 inch wrists and I feel the 11 series clasps are better .Better balanced to the size of the watch.
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 08:28 AM   #8
amanbra
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichelleP View Post
I am waiting on a Submariner, 124060 or 126610LN. I currently have the previous iteration (Hulk). I have a 6.5" wrist and do like larger watches. My question is with the clasp. Does anyone feel the width of the new clasp is uncomfortable? I have tried on an exhibition one only and not size of course so difficult to tell how the clasp will feel.
I have a 6.5 inch wrist with the new sub, the clasp is fine, just center it properly by having 4 links on the 6 side.

The blade of the clasp is actually the same length as other rolex models, it's just the out shell is larger because of the glidelock, which is the best mechanism ever made...
amanbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 09:41 AM   #9
MichelleP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area
Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial
Posts: 4,169
Thank you all. Hoping it will arrive before the end of the year
MichelleP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 05:49 PM   #10
Ollie1982
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub, Exp, DJ & Pam
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by amanbra View Post
I have a 6.5 inch wrist with the new sub, the clasp is fine, just center it properly by having 4 links on the 6 side.

The blade of the clasp is actually the same length as other rolex models, it's just the out shell is larger because of the glidelock, which is the best mechanism ever made...
Came here to make this point, well made amanbra!

I've just compared the blade from my BLNR and new model Sub and they are identical in length
Ollie1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 06:02 PM   #11
28mm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by amanbra View Post
I have a 6.5 inch wrist with the new sub, the clasp is fine, just center it properly by having 4 links on the 6 side.

The blade of the clasp is actually the same length as other rolex models, it's just the out shell is larger because of the glidelock, which is the best mechanism ever made...
Exactly right, I just got a 126610LV and also have a 6.5" wrist. The AD sized it 4 links on each side and it fits perfectly.

Then i looked at my 124060 and realized it had 5/4 Links and I adjusted that one too..
__________________
124060 • 126610LV • 16613 • 116710LN • 16710 116713 • 126710BLNR • 116520 • 16570 • 214270 • 16622 • 116400V • 116900 • 124300 • 114300 * 116334 • 116519LN • 126720VTNR
28mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 12:25 PM   #12
Dougiebaby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichelleP View Post
I am waiting on a Submariner, 124060 or 126610LN. I currently have the previous iteration (Hulk). I have a 6.5" wrist and do like larger watches. My question is with the clasp. Does anyone feel the width of the new clasp is uncomfortable? I have tried on an exhibition one only and not sized of course so difficult to tell how the clasp will feel.

I just got the new Starbucks and can’t tell the difference in terms of feel from my old 114060. If you like them up side by side you can see the difference. But not really feel it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dougiebaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 01:17 PM   #13
John1083
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 68
Uncomfortable? Not at all, In fact it’s extremely comfortable. Had a 116610 and got the call on a 124060 in March. Hasn’t left my wrist since.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
John1083 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 03:57 PM   #14
Jarrah
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Australia
Watch: SubC Date
Posts: 16
Not at all, this isn't some cheap $2 off-brand junk store watch. Rolex put a lot of research and development into their designs and the clasps are very comfortable.
Jarrah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2021, 10:50 AM   #15
rkny
"TRF" Member
 
rkny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC at heart
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarrah View Post
this isn't some cheap $2 off-brand junk store watch.
Thanks for clearing that up.
rkny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2021, 12:45 AM   #16
rolexest
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Canada
Watch: ya gunna do
Posts: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkny View Post
Thanks for clearing that up.
rolexest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 04:06 PM   #17
Pattyb69
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CT
Watch: BLNR|LVC|PAM 911
Posts: 1,085
I wouldn’t say it’s uncomfortable but the larger clasp, less taper, and wider bracelet is something I can definitely feel when comparing to my 116610lv bracelet. It’s comfortable, but I find the previous 116610 bracelet a tad comfier
Pattyb69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 05:43 PM   #18
shaunylw
"TRF" Member
 
shaunylw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,519
I did notice it was larger at first, but it’s extremely comfortable. My wrist might be slightly larger than yours but not by much. I prefer the new bracelet size, it’s very comfortable.
shaunylw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 05:52 PM   #19
majidessa
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: .
Posts: 278
I own a Hulk and 41 Sub ND, I have not noticed any significant changes between the two specially when it comes to wearability, I even like the clasp on the newer version slightly better and it fit nicely with the new bracelet size!

Both are gorgeous watches you will enjoy them equally

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
majidessa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 08:06 PM   #20
stevek84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: S/West
Posts: 59
I also have a small wrist, and own a 2014 sub. I tried on the new gen sub a few weeks back and I found the clasp to look and feel a lot bigger and chunkier than the one I own. Definitely wont be changing mine for a 41 that's for sure
stevek84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 08:27 PM   #21
Ollie1982
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub, Exp, DJ & Pam
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevek84 View Post
I also have a small wrist, and own a 2014 sub. I tried on the new gen sub a few weeks back and I found the clasp to look and feel a lot bigger and chunkier than the one I own. Definitely wont be changing mine for a 41 that's for sure
Genuinely interested to understand how your wrist can 'feel' the whole additional 1mm in clasp width, considering how the blade (the bit that actually comes into contact with your wrist) is the same size?
Ollie1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2021, 09:25 PM   #22
Dini
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Real Name: Fu
Location: London
Watch: 124060/126710BLRO
Posts: 313
I have a 124060 and a 126710 - I don't notice anything substantially different between the two whilst wearing them so I can only imagine the difference between a 116610 and a 124060/126610 to be negligible.
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2021, 12:55 AM   #23
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,153
I am in the same scenario as you. I owned a 116610LV and recently purchased a 124060. My impressions may be different from others...

I will start by saying, overall, I think the new Submariner proportions are perfect. To my eye, the watch absolutely wears larger than the "11" references. Part of that is the ~40.5mm diameter, but the other part is the larger clasp. It doesn't bother me and this is coming from someone who had zero issues with the supercase and the proportions of the previous model.

I like that the current generation Submariners and GMT-Master IIs wear a little differently than the previous generations which seemed very similar in fit. The Submariner does feel a little larger, more "industrial," than its refined cousin.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2021, 09:54 AM   #24
MichelleP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area
Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial
Posts: 4,169
Thank you everyone for your input.
MichelleP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2021, 09:59 AM   #25
SaintMickey
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 885
I just picked up a 126610LN. The only thing that gives me pause is the clasp and that wider bracelet but I'm beginning (Gasp!) to think it might actually balance the watch on the wrist better.

I think the tapper and width on the one on left is better but...can't fight city hall!

SaintMickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2021, 10:42 AM   #26
ap1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,132
6.5 checkin in. I’m mixed on the new clasp. It takes up the entire underside of my wrist. I can live with it, but I’m not in the new trumps old camp on this debate. It’s neutral on it. They both have +/-s
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2021, 12:21 AM   #27
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
It’s very subjective. I tried on a few new Subs and I feel the bracelet/clasp is too wide. I am not a fan. I have owned 5 digit and 6 digit Subs previously.
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2021, 12:28 AM   #28
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,356
Depends on your wrist I guess. I like both and own both (114 and 124)

To me, the visual difference is more apparent than the wearing experience.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2021, 12:41 AM   #29
rolexest
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Canada
Watch: ya gunna do
Posts: 508
I did notice it and didn't like it which is why I didn't get any of the new subs. I have a 114060 and a 116610LV.
rolexest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2021, 05:16 AM   #30
Mike I
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 71
Michelle, my wrist is 6.75 and I wear my watches on the loose side. I wore sub date purchased in 2012 until acquiring 41 sub date in Aug. Didn’t realize clasps were different until I read it on TRF. I think you’ll be fine.

Last edited by Mike I; 18 December 2021 at 06:09 AM.. Reason: Numbers accidentally added at end.
Mike I is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.