ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

BlakeA · 17 April 2020, 07:47 AM

[QUOTE=mgsooner;10544619]Took this photo last night. I held the camera as far away from my wrist as I possibly could then cropped/zoomed in. IMHO some of the The Great Lug Controversy is driven by zoomed in/blown up photos on the net. In real life settings, at real life viewing distances, it is much less of an issue. At least for me.

My sentiments exactly. I’m wearing my 114060 and looking at it right now, the lugs don’t even appear as fat as in your picture, which I agree, is much more accurate than most pics of this watch on the web.
BTW Matt, as a fellow Tulsan, we’re you able to source your 114060 and your Explorer locally?

17 April 2020, 07:47 AM	#24
BlakeA "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2018 Location: Tulsa Posts: 269	[QUOTE=mgsooner;10544619]Took this photo last night. I held the camera as far away from my wrist as I possibly could then cropped/zoomed in. IMHO some of the The Great Lug Controversy is driven by zoomed in/blown up photos on the net. In real life settings, at real life viewing distances, it is much less of an issue. At least for me. My sentiments exactly. I’m wearing my 114060 and looking at it right now, the lugs don’t even appear as fat as in your picture, which I agree, is much more accurate than most pics of this watch on the web. BTW Matt, as a fellow Tulsan, we’re you able to source your 114060 and your Explorer locally?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)