ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 October 2012, 09:26 PM | #91 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: EU
Watch: them come and go..
Posts: 2,052
|
Quote:
|
|
9 October 2012, 11:45 AM | #92 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: China
Posts: 2
|
The 2500 is better for dress and the 8500 is better as a time toll, you can decide what to choose according to what do you want.
|
11 October 2012, 08:12 PM | #93 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Rishi
Location: Dubai, UAE
Watch: Rolex Daytona 1165
Posts: 84
|
After weeks of indecision, I went for the 2500
- v v limited availability - suits my slimmer wrist better - works with both suits and with jeans (the 8500 is gorgeous but too thick) - can always go for the 8500 next year as the casual watch (once there is relative peace at home re the topic of getting another watch) - love the sea horse creature |
13 October 2012, 07:28 AM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Roberto
Location: Italy
Posts: 3
|
...sorry for the bad photo...this is my Planet Ocean 42mm 8500!!!
|
17 October 2012, 01:29 PM | #95 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
|
Quote:
Quantum of Solace on the block:
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black. |
|
18 October 2012, 08:22 PM | #96 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Uk
Posts: 1
|
Went to an AD a few weeks ago to buy a 2500 tried on a 8500 and it was a 8500 from that moment. Couldn't get it at the price I wanted so I went home done some digging on the net and its being delivered early next week.
|
26 October 2012, 06:14 AM | #97 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3
|
Spent the last two weeks looking at the 2500 & 8500 models...
I personally didn't notice the bigger case on the 8500 as much as some of you note here. I will say that unless you're a bigger guy the 45mm is a big & HEAVY watch. I have a 7.5 wrist and it was big. Definitely felt the "heft" of the 45mm when wearing it. What I did notice that sold me on the 8500 was the following: -The Sapphire Crystal back showing the new 8500 movement. It just looks "rich" - it's another focal point of the watch. -The lumes on the 8500 being a pure white on the face & hands whereas the 2500's definitely have a light green tint. -The ceramic bezel (I was worried about the "greyish" look on the 8500) but I truly don't even notice it - it blends perfectly into the overall body of the watch for me) Just my 2 cents... |
26 October 2012, 10:22 AM | #98 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: mark eisenberg
Location: long island, ny
Watch: AP ROO Themes
Posts: 77
|
The 8500 would be my choice, you get a lot of watch for the money. It has a great wrist presence and is very versatile.
|
1 November 2012, 01:20 PM | #99 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Georgian
Location: Constanta_Romania
Watch: 216570 Polar
Posts: 904
|
PO 8500 for me
|
2 November 2012, 09:13 AM | #100 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Matt
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,046
|
Deffo the 2500 for me. Although I'm biased for sentimental reasons.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 16610 LV 'M'. Rolex Submariner 16610 'M'. Rolex Sea-Dweller 126600. Omega Seamaster 2226.80.00. Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 2907.50.91 . |
3 November 2012, 02:02 AM | #101 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex Sports 5+6
Posts: 154
|
I find the 8500 very high. Too high. Tried it and was surprised by the nice feel on the wrist. Somehow the watch works out good even if it looks too high.
The overall weight with steel bracelet was too much for me. The 170g of a Seamaster 2500 are the max that I can use for longer periods. Looked for the Liquidmetal with ceramic version of the 2500 PO. Found it. Very expensive, but a nice watch. Did not take it.
__________________
Best regards, Andi |
6 November 2012, 01:32 AM | #102 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,298
|
I wouldnt sell my SubC to get one but I would buy the 8500, altho Im liking the new SMPc more and more...
|
6 November 2012, 02:04 AM | #103 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BIG BEAR, CA
Posts: 1,468
|
Quote:
But if the SUB is not singing to the OP, then that's all that matters. Your $$ is way too precious to be sunk into something that doesn't make you smile. So whether you buy a PO or a SEIKO, you will be making a better decision than sticking with the SUB-C. |
|
6 November 2012, 02:54 PM | #104 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glendora
Posts: 215
|
2500 and I find no need to replace it with 8500.
A 8500 is in the near future, but definitely not from another PO. Likely an Aqua Terra.
__________________
Omega Planet Ocean 42mm 2201.50 Rolex Submariner 16610LV |
7 November 2012, 07:01 AM | #105 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,254
|
Quote:
|
|
7 November 2012, 11:09 AM | #106 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,254
|
and another:
|
9 November 2012, 11:43 PM | #107 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Watch: SD,Daytona,P233,PO
Posts: 163
|
8500
|
11 November 2012, 05:10 AM | #108 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 116233 Serti
Posts: 204
|
Most Accurate
I have both the 2500C and the new 8500 Planet Ocean. The 8500 is by far the most accurate automatic. Both movements are more accurate then my Rolex and only my Breitling Super Quartz is more accurate than the 8500.
__________________
Rolex 116233 Serti; Omega 300 Master Co-Axial 41mm Titanium; Breitling Aerospace EVO; Omega Planet Ocean 600M Steel on Steel 42mm" |
11 November 2012, 01:15 PM | #109 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
8500 me too!
I'm addition to the movement, I love the ceramic bezel. |
14 November 2012, 11:53 PM | #110 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Hui
Location: Singapore
Watch: Omega
Posts: 16
|
I thought of getting the Rolex GMT... Is 8500 planet ocean more accurate then the GMT?
|
15 November 2012, 05:59 AM | #111 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
Accuracy is down to how its regulated and worn, both are accurate movements, but the 8500 is technically superior in every aspect, which is to be expected for a 25 year newer movement.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
15 November 2012, 06:28 AM | #112 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 11
|
I own the 2500, but may pick up an 8500.
|
15 November 2012, 07:54 AM | #113 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SoCal
Watch: PO
Posts: 19
|
I personally love the 8500 but the thickness is the only issue i have.
|
23 November 2012, 02:44 AM | #114 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
|
2500C for me (just got yesterday).
__________________
2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601 1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000 Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324 *RIP PAL 1942-2015 |
30 November 2012, 09:11 PM | #115 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 83
|
You need to try both on your wrist to see which has a better appeal. You won't go wrong with this test.
|
18 January 2013, 04:25 AM | #116 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brasil
Posts: 1,048
|
For me 8500!
And I must say, doesn´t matter with cloth are you wearing, matches with anything! Suits, t-shirt, etc... Mine says Hi! |
19 January 2013, 01:10 PM | #117 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
|
2500 of course. I got it back in December and I just can't take it off. This watch is one of the most accurate I've ever owned.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle |
20 January 2013, 06:49 AM | #118 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 526
|
PO LM LE. Best of both worlds.
Love mine. |
26 January 2013, 07:10 AM | #119 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: uk
Watch: omega PO LM LE
Posts: 77
|
Don,t think it matters 2500 or 8500 . They are all good. Here,s my POLM 42 2500
|
26 January 2013, 07:19 AM | #120 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,843
|
Quote:
I agree
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.