The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 March 2022, 12:14 AM   #31
EEpro
2024 Pledge Member
 
EEpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,117
Don’t click here if you don’t like post about accuracy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
Yes - poor precision is only inferred by variations in actual accuracy. For people without the skills or training to use a timegrapher, or lacks the time to perform those measurements, Watch Tracker is a good tool.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Agreed. It's a cheap and easy health check if you don't want to commit the time to knowing the real rate. I used to have a timegrapher and sold it. I spend my days at work designing and measuring clocks and frequency references for aerospace applications so it felt a little too much like work to be a hobby.

This is a real man's timegrapher measuring ~6 femtoseconds of RMS jitter. I paid $280,000 for this box.

__________________
Ω
2FA Active
EEpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2022, 02:10 AM   #32
edisonstar23
"TRF" Member
 
edisonstar23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by EEpro View Post
Agreed. It's a cheap and easy health check if you don't want to commit the time to knowing the real rate. I used to have a timegrapher and sold it. I spend my days at work designing and measuring clocks and frequency references for aerospace applications so it felt a little too much like work to be a hobby.

This is a real man's timegrapher measuring ~6 femtoseconds of RMS jitter. I paid $280,000 for this box.


Wow that’s some serious machine!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
edisonstar23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2022, 06:31 AM   #33
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,742
Don’t click here if you don’t like post about accuracy

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMGoodnight369 View Post
Just wanted to share my first run of timing point from my 124060. Picked it up fresh from AD early January and I’ve been checking it daily. I enjoy it and find it both interesting and impressive so no need for the “what does it matter there’s 86400 seconds in a day” comments lol. Any way I generally prefer watches run a bit on the faster side but I can easily deal with this. I rest DU over night and it’s on wrist for about 14 hours a day. I’m quite active as well so the arm gets a lot of movement. Haven’t put it on a timegrapher yet but I would imagine on there it’s right at -1 a day. From what I’ve gathered from post on here a good bit of 32xx movements seem to be regulated on the slow side.
Your 124060 has the 3230 caliber installed. Plenty of timekeeping measurements for various 32xx watches are discussed here:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=786299

My timegrapher rates, amplitudes, and precision measurements along the entire power reserve (for 6 different watches) you can find here:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...postcount=1232

A simple sketch to illustrate the difference between accuracy and precision:

saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.