AD got the new GMT for exhibition. It’s not as bad as I thought…

[IFlyPlanes]

I still prefer my Batman though.

[Mr. Superlative]

That looks very nice! I think it’ll be a bit of a future classic.

[agriculture&watches]

I agree with you. In my opinion Batman looks much better

[Scottyboy]

Not only does the BLNR look better, but so does the all black version they discontinued a few years back.

[kopi-c]

Started to see them too here in Singapore. It looks nice either in oyster steel or jubilee.

[Manamana]

Batman looks better.

[padi56]

Its a shame they don't dich all this ceramic bezel stuff and go back to the cheap DIY change aluminium inserts, then expect you could get all colours never was a fan of ceramic.

[Harry-57]

A shame they only finished half the bezel insert.

[travisb]

I like it.

[Easy E]

I prefer my BLNR

[saxo3]

Ugly watch with a 3285 movement, can't be much worse
Carry on …

[1William]

I like it but prefer it on the Jubilee. This is probably my next Rolex purchase.

[DoubleDeac]

It is a bit boring for a GMT. However, I do like the subtle green touches here and there. Would love to see one under direct sunlight in person - I suspect that grey will look really good.

[h20addict]

I dig it.

[TRS1]

Very classy.

[Duke10]

I’m sorry but that’s awful…..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Marcjvr]

Originally Posted by IFlyPlanes

I still prefer my Batman though.

Looks really good on your wrist

Have you considered becoming a wrist model for Rolex lol

[Vipes]

Looks nice. I bet it looks better in person.

[Kinnakeet]

Originally Posted by saxo3

Ugly watch with a 3285 movement, can't be much worse
Carry on …

[THC]

:If a display dummy watch where is the 10.10 time ? They all normally have

[davek35]

Very nice! If offered, I'd snap my card on the counter asap.

[brandrea]

I like it

[jackminny15]

Originally Posted by 1William

I like it but prefer it on the Jubilee. This is probably my next Rolex purchase.

Ditto!

[CharlesN]

I suppose it could be worse ..

But not a lot worse.

Why choose such a drab boring look.

Instead of trying (and failing) to make a good looking watch why didn't Rolex attempt to fix some of the problems they have with their existing Oyster range of watches that have a pretty rubbish 32xx movement inside.

[Mr Ben]

“Not as bad as I thought” is hardly a ringing endorsement! I think that tells us a lot.

These aren’t doing it for me though I’m warming to a lightly used 16710 with an assortment of bezels.

[espanol]

Rolex has proven they could create anything, and it would sell out. This is a perfect example.

[Gearjockey]

Originally Posted by saxo3

Ugly watch with a 3285 movement, can't be much worse
Carry on …

Lol.

Oh I’m sure they’ve ironed out the wrinkles on the newest production units.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by Kinnakeet

Why have certain forum members got to slag off the 32 movements at every opportunity.

[TickTockChuck]

At first I didn't like it, but after seeing regular in-person pics from other TRF members, I actually rather like it. Only wish the 24h hand/text was in a different color other than green to differentiate it from the prior all black GMT. I've been waiting for a BLNR for over 3 years but would gladly consider the GRNR which I bet looks much better in person. Cheers

[RTG]

Originally Posted by padi56

Why have certain forum members got to slag off the 32 movements at every opportunity.

Inferiority complex and low self esteem. Can't understand that a major brands make products for anyone other than them. Center of the universe syndrome. Poor guy, must be a miserable.