The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 January 2010, 04:46 PM   #1
tudorman8276
"TRF" Member
 
tudorman8276's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,584
...VINTAGE experts COME HERE...MOD'S, Orchi, Springer, Onkyo...

...here we have what is presented as a 6605.

...PERSONALLY, I have a problem with the CASE.

...NOTICE the location of the 6605 (on the TOP area of the end).

...I OWN a 2T 6605. On MY 6605, the location of the model# is on the bottom. ABOVE the model# is Brevet and the Swiss cross. (MY ser# is located on the TOP, same as the one presented.) The font appears correct.

...PERSONALLY, I consider the CASE as HIGHLY SUSPECT-COUNTERFEIT.

...what say the EXPERTS?? EXPLANATIONS????

http://cgi.ebay.com/1941-Rolex-DateJ...item27ae9854ae

6605.JPG

ser#.JPG
tudorman8276 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2010, 07:59 PM   #2
idk01
"TRF" Member
 
idk01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
We need the help of our wise and most respected Buddy Orchi here
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth

idk01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 01:47 AM   #3
tudorman8276
"TRF" Member
 
tudorman8276's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,584
^^^^^^^^come on MODS and vintage fellers...

tudorman8276 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 07:24 AM   #4
onkyo
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
Stan, I too am familiar with 'Brevet' and a cross on the case with the model number below....

Also look at the first two digits of the serial (both 2's)... the are quite different from each other esp at the left upper portion. I too think suspect.... but I am not an expert on ref 6605.... never owned one and probably never will.

Where is our Buddy Orchi????
onkyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 10:43 AM   #5
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,239
Older stampings are not perfect and sometimes look rather crude or "fake" compared to newer stampings from Rolex. I see nothing with the dial or bracelet that indicates it is not genuine. It appears to be in the condition that an old, beat-up Rolex would be in for 55-years-old.

I can't explain the stamping locations on the watch case but they appear genuine and worn as they should. This is not a high-dollar collector watch that someone would put a lot of time into to misrepresent or counterfeit.

With all said here, one should exercise caution and ask for better pics or buy it in person and have it examined.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 11:15 AM   #6
Rscmaine
"TRF" Member
 
Rscmaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Nat Parkinson
Location: Maine, USA
Watch: me pull a rabbit..
Posts: 1,196
Wish I'd seen it...I'd love a 70 year old automatic Rolex for $1K

"And I'll hug him, and pet him and call him George..."



Seriously, these were all made by hand back then, weren't they? Is it possible that this one was a minor error?

Did the OP win the auction?
__________________
When the alien spaceships actually landed, to everyone's surprise, it turned out that the world's governments had not been hiding anything. They were just as clueless as the rest of us!
Rscmaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 12:56 PM   #7
pz93c
"TRF" Member
 
pz93c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rscmaine View Post
Wish I'd seen it...I'd love a 70 year old automatic Rolex for $1K
No kidding.
pz93c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 01:11 PM   #8
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
1941?
Is this true:
1945 - The Oyster Datejust goes on sale. Automatically sets the correct date for each month (perpetual month).
CaveDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 01:22 PM   #9
tudorman8276
"TRF" Member
 
tudorman8276's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,584
...correct observation...

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaveDiver View Post
1941?
Is this true:
1945 - The Oyster Datejust goes on sale. Automatically sets the correct date for each month (perpetual month).
...the seller does not know the correct dating, which with the 200,000 ser# would be 55-56 time frame.

...my 6605 has a 100,000 ser#.
tudorman8276 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 01:32 PM   #10
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by tudorman8276 View Post
...the seller does not know the correct dating, which with the 200,000 ser# would be 55-56 time frame.

...my 6605 has a 100,000 ser#.
Thanks, that matches the caseback.
CaveDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 05:37 PM   #11
Orchi
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
Err buddy Stan...thanks for the head up...

1st up...Orchi thinks the Dial is refinished...
2ndly...Orchi has NOT seen any case so far...
that were fitted with bracelet...
which would NOT have any scratches or abrasion marks between the lugs...

Even if the watch case was previously fitted with leather straps...
there bound to have some signs of wear n tear between the lugs...

On the stamping issue...n its positions...
Rolex do stamp them on different spot...
n sometimes it can be off centered...
BUT in this case Orchi thinks not the case of inconsistency...

By 1956(shown in caseback)...there normally would be...
"REGISTERED DESIGN" or at the least "STAINLESS STEEL" stamp
between the lugs...to be consistent.

Buddy Stan's 6605 has the correct "BREVET n +"...which is consistent on the
much older cases of the 40s...n even on later cases of the 50s.
n Buddy Stan's 6605...could even have different stamps on the caseback.

Therefore...Orchi is in opinion that the eBay's 6605 watch example...
could likely be...a RECASE...

Oh btw...not to be mistaken...the RECASE could have been done by RSC long time ago...
as it was a norm that RSC would replace the case(old one too badly worn out)...
n RE-STAMP the original S/N # n Ref # on the replacement cases during that time...

Besides...Datejust replacement cases...are of abundance...plentiful.
Orchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 10:21 PM   #12
TimeToGo
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orchi View Post
Err buddy Stan...thanks for the head up...

1st up...Orchi thinks the Dial is refinished...
2ndly...Orchi has NOT seen any case so far...
that were fitted with bracelet...
which would NOT have any scratches or abrasion marks between the lugs...

Even if the watch case was previously fitted with leather straps...
there bound to have some signs of wear n tear between the lugs...

On the stamping issue...n its positions...
Rolex do stamp them on different spot...
n sometimes it can be off centered...
BUT in this case Orchi thinks not the case of inconsistency...

By 1956(shown in caseback)...there normally would be...
"REGISTERED DESIGN" or at the least "STAINLESS STEEL" stamp
between the lugs...to be consistent.

Buddy Stan's 6605 has the correct "BREVET n +"...which is consistent on the
much older cases of the 40s...n even on later cases of the 50s.
n Buddy Stan's 6605...could even have different stamps on the caseback.

Therefore...Orchi is in opinion that the eBay's 6605 watch example...
could likely be...a RECASE...

Oh btw...not to be mistaken...the RECASE could have been done by RSC long time ago...
as it was a norm that RSC would replace the case(old one too badly worn out)...
n RE-STAMP the original S/N # n Ref # on the replacement cases during that time...

Besides...Datejust replacement cases...are of abundance...plentiful.
We miss you around here Buddy Orchi!
TimeToGo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 11:35 PM   #13
VAIO11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Edd
Location: singapore
Watch: 5513
Posts: 10
Buddy Orchi been very busy in VRF nowadays...
The guys here miss you alot Buddy Orchi :-=)
VAIO11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2010, 12:08 AM   #14
idk01
"TRF" Member
 
idk01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by VAIO11 View Post
Buddy Orchi been very busy in VRF nowadays...
The guys here miss you alot Buddy Orchi :-=)
And then some!!!!! we do miss you Buddy Orchi!!!! and a bit thank-you again for the info!!
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth

idk01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2010, 04:18 AM   #15
tudorman8276
"TRF" Member
 
tudorman8276's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,584
...buddies Orchi, Springer...and all with input...

...thank you for the input.

...I never gave it a thought to the possibility of a re-case.

...I guess Rolex was doing that back then too.
tudorman8276 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2010, 04:44 AM   #16
onkyo
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orchi View Post
Err buddy Stan...thanks for the head up...

1st up...Orchi thinks the Dial is refinished...
2ndly...Orchi has NOT seen any case so far...
that were fitted with bracelet...
which would NOT have any scratches or abrasion marks between the lugs...

Even if the watch case was previously fitted with leather straps...
there bound to have some signs of wear n tear between the lugs...

On the stamping issue...n its positions...
Rolex do stamp them on different spot...
n sometimes it can be off centered...
BUT in this case Orchi thinks not the case of inconsistency...

By 1956(shown in caseback)...there normally would be...
"REGISTERED DESIGN" or at the least "STAINLESS STEEL" stamp
between the lugs...to be consistent.

Buddy Stan's 6605 has the correct "BREVET n +"...which is consistent on the
much older cases of the 40s...n even on later cases of the 50s.
n Buddy Stan's 6605...could even have different stamps on the caseback.

Therefore...Orchi is in opinion that the eBay's 6605 watch example...
could likely be...a RECASE...

Oh btw...not to be mistaken...the RECASE could have been done by RSC long time ago...
as it was a norm that RSC would replace the case(old one too badly worn out)...
n RE-STAMP the original S/N # n Ref # on the replacement cases during that time...

Besides...Datejust replacement cases...are of abundance...plentiful.
Great info Buddy Orchi....

Thank you!
onkyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.