ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

obmto · 27 March 2010, 12:56 PM

bravo3_7 · 27 March 2010, 01:24 PM

Looks fine to me. It's not the best lighting and there are shadows to the left of the watch because of it. But, I see nothing wrong with it. What about it jumps out as fake to you? With the increasing quality of some fakes nowadays, you'll need to see the movement to be sure me thinks.

ParisDakarBmw · 27 March 2010, 01:43 PM

Nothing that stands out as a fake. Not the best picture but it looks O.K. I like the new lume on that model myself.

obmto · 29 March 2010, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by obmto

Try to have another look. Here is a pic of a genuine:

I don't think bezel font magically gets thinner with poorer photography. Nor do date openings get less beveled.

TimeToGo · 29 March 2010, 04:30 AM

Do you have a better pic?

BASSETHOUNDS · 29 March 2010, 04:40 AM

Impossible to tell whether it's good or fake on the first picture .

sleddog · 29 March 2010, 04:44 AM

To the OP...
Your posting up a crappy,grainy picture + you seem to know the answer already.....
Like you can even see the beveled date window from that shot.....
Why are you asking??? I'm getting the feeling you are baiting here.......

Lets see a better photo and maybe you'll get more answers!!!

obmto · 29 March 2010, 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog1000

To the OP...
Your posting up a crappy,grainy picture + you seem to know the answer already.....
Like you can even see the beveled date window from that shot.....
Why are you asking??? I'm getting the feeling you are baiting here.......

Lets see a better photo and maybe you'll get more answers!!!

Don't have a better pic cause it's not my watch. And the poser who's watch it is refuses to provide better pic. Poser said to post on TRF and see how everyone will say it's not fake.

Grainy picture or not, I think the difference in bezel font is enough to say fake. Anyone else agree?

Is all the hostility necessary? What would I be baiting exactly?

Mosco · 29 March 2010, 05:41 AM

Ok - chill, Ob. No hostility here. Bottom line is - the picture is not enough to make any conclusion. If the 'poser' doesn't want to provide better pics, and you're considering buying - simple, walk away.

bravo3_7 · 29 March 2010, 07:36 AM

Obmto, are you "one of those guys", looking for a "gotcha" moment here?

If you are not buying this watch, and the picture is not conclusive, why do you care? Let me guess, the guy is not selling the watch either, he's just showing it off or something? If I'm right, then why do you care? From what I see, the watch looks OK. But, like I said, to be sure, you either must get better pics, or see the movement. And, if the watch is not yours, and will not be yours, then let it go. Then, it does not matter. It's not like the owner has an obligation to show you anything, right? Now, if you are buying it, that's a different story.

obmto · 29 March 2010, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bravo3_7

Obmto, are you "one of those guys", looking for a "gotcha" moment here?

If you are not buying this watch, and the picture is not conclusive, why do you care? Let me guess, the guy is not selling the watch either, he's just showing it off or something? If I'm right, then why do you care? From what I see, the watch looks OK. But, like I said, to be sure, you either must get better pics, or see the movement. And, if the watch is not yours, and will not be yours, then let it go. Then, it does not matter. It's not like the owner has an obligation to show you anything, right? Now, if you are buying it, that's a different story.

So you are ok with people passing fakes off as gens because it's not for sale? I guess brand reputation means nothing to you.

Earl Camembert · 29 March 2010, 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by obmto

So you are ok with people passing fakes off as gens because it's not for sale? I guess brand reputation means nothing to you.

Why don't you ask Rolex that question?

Johny · 29 March 2010, 08:39 AM

HI which one are you selling.

bravo3_7 · 29 March 2010, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by obmto

So you are ok with people passing fakes off as gens because it's not for sale? I guess brand reputation means nothing to you.

Your comment is so childish, I'm not even going to address it.

Tools · 29 March 2010, 09:15 AM

Closed because it's a really dumb thread........

Padlock.jpg

27 March 2010, 12:56 PM	#1
obmto Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: PA Posts: 31	Dssd???

29 March 2010, 04:44 AM	#7
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,907	To the OP... Your posting up a crappy,grainy picture + you seem to know the answer already..... Like you can even see the beveled date window from that shot..... Why are you asking??? I'm getting the feeling you are baiting here....... Lets see a better photo and maybe you'll get more answers!!! __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

29 March 2010, 05:41 AM	#9
Mosco "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Greg Location: Cincinnati Watch: I like to... Posts: 18,567	Ok - chill, Ob. No hostility here. Bottom line is - the picture is not enough to make any conclusion. If the 'poser' doesn't want to provide better pics, and you're considering buying - simple, walk away. __________________ Instagram - @CaliberSwiss *“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson*

29 March 2010, 09:15 AM	#15
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,135	Closed because it's a really dumb thread........ Padlock.jpg __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

27 March 2010, 01:24 PM	#2
bravo3_7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: James Location: USA Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 12	Looks fine to me. It's not the best lighting and there are shadows to the left of the watch because of it. But, I see nothing wrong with it. What about it jumps out as fake to you? With the increasing quality of some fakes nowadays, you'll need to see the movement to be sure me thinks.

27 March 2010, 01:43 PM	#3
ParisDakarBmw Banned Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Paul Location: New Haven, CT Watch: 116610 Sub-C Posts: 6,552	Nothing that stands out as a fake. Not the best picture but it looks O.K. I like the new lume on that model myself.

29 March 2010, 04:30 AM	#5
TimeToGo 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,618	Do you have a better pic?

29 March 2010, 04:40 AM	#6
BASSETHOUNDS Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Tristan Location: GIRONA , SPAIN Watch: 116520/660/710/334 Posts: 7,147	Impossible to tell whether it's good or fake on the first picture .

29 March 2010, 07:36 AM	#10
bravo3_7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: James Location: USA Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 12	Obmto, are you "one of those guys", looking for a "gotcha" moment here? If you are not buying this watch, and the picture is not conclusive, why do you care? Let me guess, the guy is not selling the watch either, he's just showing it off or something? If I'm right, then why do you care? From what I see, the watch looks OK. But, like I said, to be sure, you either must get better pics, or see the movement. And, if the watch is not yours, and will not be yours, then let it go. Then, it does not matter. It's not like the owner has an obligation to show you anything, right? Now, if you are buying it, that's a different story.

29 March 2010, 08:39 AM	#13
Johny "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: john Location: Scotland Watch: sub 16610Lv Posts: 13,523	HI which one are you selling.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)