ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

blaine mattison · 6 May 2010, 04:34 PM

yes the 7 number serial number but to include the following

1. the rose on the dial is to low. out of position
2. the arrow hour markers painted. applied type is correct
3. the big rose dial is before the 9050 ref number of tudor
4. 9050 is a ref number for a date
5. wrong script/style on the numbers inbetween the lugs
6. marking of the number to deep
7. the movement is not a eta 2784
8. movement marked "water resistant"
9. the case back is fake
10. the 1019 ref. on case back (rolex milguass)
11. the case back doesn't not say stainless steel
12. the crown is fake/aftermarket
so if this discovered. i am sure that the hands, crystal, case
and all parts down to the last screw not geniune

6 May 2010, 04:34 PM	#17
blaine mattison "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: blaine Location: memphis Watch: my next find Posts: 1,060	yes the 7 number serial number but to include the following 1. the rose on the dial is to low. out of position 2. the arrow hour markers painted. applied type is correct 3. the big rose dial is before the 9050 ref number of tudor 4. 9050 is a ref number for a date 5. wrong script/style on the numbers inbetween the lugs 6. marking of the number to deep 7. the movement is not a eta 2784 8. movement marked "water resistant" 9. the case back is fake 10. the 1019 ref. on case back (rolex milguass) 11. the case back doesn't not say stainless steel 12. the crown is fake/aftermarket so if this discovered. i am sure that the hands, crystal, case and all parts down to the last screw not geniune

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)