The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 May 2010, 01:21 PM   #1
WatchDude007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 4
Opinion needed on an Omega

Hi guys,

I'm new to the forums. I was referred here by a member of a car forum. Anyhow, I'm looking into purchasing an Omega in the very near future. So far I've narrowed it down to either the Seamaster 300 M chrono diver or the 300 M chronometer.

The design of the chrono diver is a bit more striking but the chronometer has the co-axial escapement. So I have two questions for you guys: which should I go with (which would YOU go with)?? and if I go with the 300 M chronometer, should I go with the quartz or automatic (any major things I should know about)??

I'm new to watches for please forgive my ignorance. Thank you for any advice/opinion in advance!!
WatchDude007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 01:23 PM   #2
chriseskew24
"TRF" Member
 
chriseskew24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Christopher
Location: fort lauderdale
Watch: Bunches
Posts: 1,860
Well personaly I would get a automatic just because I can not justify buying a quarty watch for that kind of coin..
chriseskew24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 01:36 PM   #3
warrior
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,671
1. I'd get the non-chrono. Simply b/c I like clean non fussy dials. ( The only chrono I like is the legendary Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch --check out the pics on this forum)

2. Get the automatic. Something special about owning a watch that has "soul" for lack of a better word. Quartz is fine .... but there's something to be said for owning a mechanical timepiece--automatic-- that has all these cool parts, wheels, springs, levers, and such as the engine of your watch. Though, of course, automatics have to be serviced every 5 to 7 years and you have to figure that in to the cost.

Good luck!
warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 01:38 PM   #4
Mike B
"TRF" Member
 
Mike B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Watch: DSSD, Omega SMP
Posts: 3,055
For your first Omega I would get a Non-chronograph, and auto, definitely auto !!
Mike B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 01:48 PM   #5
djohst
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose Ca
Watch: Ω and GV
Posts: 104
My first watch was an automatic and I have never looked back. even my beater timex is automatic
__________________
1954 Oyster Perpetual Honeycomb
2003 Ω Constellation Automatic
V Series Milgauss GV
djohst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 02:28 PM   #6
WatchDude007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 4
Wow it seems that the majority is the recommending automatic (pretty much expected I suppose). As for which what I should go with, that isn't so clear. I'll probably end up going with the Chronometer one (co-axial) but would like to hear other people chime in about which one they would go with so i can make up my mind.
WatchDude007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 01:56 AM   #7
pz93c
"TRF" Member
 
pz93c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,776
Depends.

Will it be the only watch you wear? Automatic.

Will you swap watches around? Quartz.

I hate setting a watch every time I pick it up.

Buy second hand. Much, much cheaper.
pz93c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 09:41 AM   #8
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Go Chrono.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2928.jpg (70.4 KB, 105 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3024.jpg (47.8 KB, 105 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3074.jpg (72.1 KB, 104 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3085.jpg (52.0 KB, 104 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0391.jpg (96.5 KB, 105 views)
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 10:39 AM   #9
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by WJGESQ View Post
Go Chrono.
Great photo
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 01:12 PM   #10
WatchDude007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 4
I'm still on the fence about which model to get. The chrono diver looks "better" but it doesn't have the co-axial escapement. Someone told me that since the chrono diver is more "complicated", it has a higher chance of breaking down. Any thought on that?
WatchDude007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 03:31 PM   #11
himmelblau
"TRF" Member
 
himmelblau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: Scottish Borders
Watch: GS SBGR051
Posts: 173
Omega says automatic service intervals are between 4 and 5 years and 10 years for a Co-Axial. When a watch is serviced is dependant on the owner, and some wait until the watch shows a problem that suggests the watch requires servicing.

Bear in mind that it costs more to have a chronograph serviced than an automatic and less again for a quartz movement. However, quartz SMP's will have to be tested for water resistance every time a battery is replaced which could be every 3 years.

You are always going to hear horror stories from people about any product on the market, some will be first hand while others will be along the line of “I know someone who”. A chronograph has more components due to the extra features it performs and some people will think that the more functions something does means there is more that can go wrong.

At the end of the day, what watch you choose will be down to research you have carried out and which you prefer. In photographic circles, we say go to your nearest dealer and try out the different models to see how they feel in your hands, I would think that the same can be said regarding a watch, try on the various models that you like and then make your decision, you are the person who has to live with it, not us.

Good luck with your search and I wish you good health to wear the watch of your choice.

Brian
himmelblau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 03:53 PM   #12
WatchDude007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 4
Thanks for the reply Brian! I'm hooked on photography though and I did check out the cameras in person before I bought it. Anyhow, I'm asking for opinions just so get a better idea of things. I will go to an authorized dealer this weekend and check out those 2 watches in person and go from there.

Thanks to everyone that replied! I'll keep you guys updated.
WatchDude007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 05:18 PM   #13
htc8p
"TRF" Member
 
htc8p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,449
chronograph for big wrist. chronometer for the rest. jmho
htc8p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 09:10 PM   #14
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Not sure about all that, but when you try on the Chrono, it will likely become the object of your desire.
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2010, 03:17 AM   #15
timetravel125
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Louie
Location: California
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 644
Buy the "real" watch--an automatic. Even though, there's nothing wrong with a quartz watch.
timetravel125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.