ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 March 2007, 06:59 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Ruben
Location: Orange County
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,317
|
Do the diamonds on that REALLY authentic looking bezel kind of spin around? I think one of my nieces had a Dora the Explorer watch that looks like that, but the diamonds are glitter and the movement is better.
|
27 March 2007, 07:28 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 242
|
$100 Prize - if you can find an uglier Rolex - $100 Prize
$100 prize* to the person who can find a homelier genuine (-ish) Roller than this little beauty.
~~ WARNING: DO NOT GAZE DIRECTLY AT THIS WATCH, FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD AND HOLY ~~ ~~~ DO NOT PROCEED IF YOUNGER THAN 18 YEARS OF AGE, OR IF YOU HAVE A WEAK HEART ~~~ * Payable by JJ. |
27 March 2007, 08:14 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 848
|
Looks to me like it was possibly tarted up by a non-Rolex jeweller... Larry.
|
27 March 2007, 09:25 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
|
Oh for God's sake, Liberace's dead - leave him be.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time. |
27 March 2007, 09:47 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
|
The $100 dollars is yours!
__________________
|
27 March 2007, 10:09 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
Yes I think a pimp lost his watch, that "thing" is FUGLY. Proof that diamonds are too common and should be worth nothing.
|
27 March 2007, 10:12 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
I count 63 stones, it has to be fake the setting on the dial is off, I have never seen a true Rolex dial where the stones were not set perfectly.
|
27 March 2007, 10:41 AM | #8 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
That's obviously some cheap POS fake. No way would Rolex come up with such an atrocity!! No WAY!!!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
27 March 2007, 02:29 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,035
|
ouch my eyes hurt! Make it stop.
|
27 March 2007, 03:03 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Han
Location: Singapore
Watch: TT GMT Master II
Posts: 130
|
Oh my Gawd !!!!
It is real piece of work, a POS, to be exact. |
27 March 2007, 04:01 PM | #11 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
Definitely a fake. Look at the cyclops magnification. Ugly too.
|
27 March 2007, 04:11 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
|
Crikey... What an abomination.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk) Rolex Explorer 114270 Sinn 356 Sa Flieger Limes Endurance 1Tausend Too many others... #2592 It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy... |
28 March 2007, 02:57 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,064
|
|
28 March 2007, 04:16 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Minnesota, USA
Watch: SS Sub-Date
Posts: 505
|
__________________
I thought I was mistaken, but then I realized I was wrong. |
28 March 2007, 04:24 AM | #15 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Well, at least it's genuine.....and still looks far, far better than that piece of crap posted above!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
28 March 2007, 05:52 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: FL
Watch: ing my second hand
Posts: 869
|
Wow! We've actually found a watch that makes the leopard daytona look good in comparison. That's like finding a girl so ugly that she makes Rosie O'Donnel look sexy!
|
28 March 2007, 06:53 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
|
JJ, the leopard is worse.
|
28 March 2007, 07:01 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
|
No, I believe that the original watch posted IS the ugliest ROLEX I have ever seen. "Tarted up" is a HUGE understatement!!!..
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society "You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson |
28 March 2007, 07:34 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,064
|
|
28 March 2007, 07:40 AM | #20 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rolex world
Watch: SS/W Skydweller
Posts: 527
|
That is truly horrible ( the lepoard Daytona is not much better!!)
The dial is at the very least heavily modified, the outer ring of diamonds on the dial are definately not original. The inner ring settings look better but too far in towards the centre and the less said about the bezel the better. If "that" was presented for repair at work we would refuse to touch it unles the owner aggreed to have it returned to original condition!! Modifications like that would invalidate the warranty too. |
28 March 2007, 08:58 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Watch: SS Sub, GMT PEPSI
Posts: 69
|
This one is pretty bad
|
28 March 2007, 12:42 PM | #22 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Sorry - DON'T agree at all. In all fairness to the Leopard Daytona, at least it's GENUINE!!!
Let me tell all of you that even the BEST and most CAREFULLY crafted REPLICA Rolex will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, in my eyes, match up with the WORST GENUINE ROLEX!! JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
28 March 2007, 12:43 PM | #23 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
28 March 2007, 01:15 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: On the Edge
Watch: Dinged & Gouged
Posts: 204
|
|
29 March 2007, 09:11 AM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 242
|
The diamond...watch...thing is available here:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...086&indexURL=9 I'm not convinced that it didn't start life as a Rolex. SUBS |
29 March 2007, 09:44 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: All with a crown.
Posts: 504
|
I'll take my $100.00 and raise you $150.00
PAtrick
__________________
"I wouldn't be part of any club that would have me as a member." Instagram: El_Diablo_Rosso |
29 March 2007, 02:19 PM | #27 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
That's cool.
|
29 March 2007, 02:41 PM | #28 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
Quote:
Are a few diamonds missing on the bezel of this monstrosity? |
|
29 March 2007, 02:52 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
|
I actually owned a similar president except the red rubies were round for indeces and I had an all gold band with no diamonds back in 2002-2004.
|
29 March 2007, 02:57 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
|
Also, JJ, the Leopard Daytona is just not popular genuine. It is a monstrosity. Also, there was a time when TT Blue subs were looked at as gaudy unpopular versions of a classic sport Rolex. Its just preference today, but that lady DJ simply has an aftermarket bezel that makes it look gaudy, but it looks genuine to me. JJ, i think the attention and great photography from you has given the TT Sub some credibility. Personally, I like the Seadweller much better. I just don't care for yellow gold on a rugged classic sport watch like a Sub.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.