![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: blaine
Location: memphis
Watch: my next find
Posts: 1,060
|
Springer, is there any trading material in the PILE!! very nice!
and if not, i would totally understand. just for sharing purposes what variations do you have of the MIGHTY, VERY WORTHY GMT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
Greetings,
I am the seller of the above-discussed watch on eBay. The watch, its case, the serial number engraving, the dial and the accessories are ALL absolutely authentic. The original poster (Springer) contacted me via eBay's messaging system to inquire why a watch that was produced in 1987 had a paper dated 1982. His original message is reproduced in its entirety below: "Question on your 16750 GMT. How can it have a 1986/87 serial number when it indicates on the warranty paper that it was sold in 1982? Something up here? George" Despite the accusatory and inflammatory tone of his message, I answered him promptly and courteously, informing him that his view of the paper was simply obscured, and that the date was in fact September 29, 1987. When he continued to contact me to imply that I was mistaken, lying or otherwise up to no good, I responded that the "7" was written with a line through the middle, as is customary in many parts of the world. Still disbelieving me, he has apparently continued to post here to disparage my watch and impugn me here. After several similar messages from the original poster, I declined to engage in a discussion of hang tags with him. I think I can safely assume the original poster has no intention of purchasing my watch, only telling others what is wrong with it. So, you will have to excuse my desire not to engage in such debates further. If any of you are seriously interested in pursuing the watch and need to know what the hang tag says, i am happy to accomodate you. My longstanding record on eBay, and my feedback, speaks for itself. I do not sell fakes. I am a longtime vintage Rolex buyer and seller, and I am fairly well known in the vintage Rolex world, outside of these forums. One of my close friends purchased this watch from the original owner's son only weeks ago, and I now offer it for sale on eBay. The watch will clearly be sold this week, as it is on eBay with a no-reserve auction. Thank you for your attention. Michael mdw3 Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
|
I like threads like this cuz i actually learn something
![]() ![]() more than just being able to wear my Sub in the shower and not worry ![]() ![]() Kudos
__________________
I used to be indecisive, now I'm not sure |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
Greetings,
I am the seller of the above-discussed watch. The watch, its case, the serial number engraving, the dial and the accessories are ALL absolutely authentic. The original poster (Springer) contacted me via the messaging system to inquire why a watch that was produced in 1987 had a paper dated 1982. His original message is reproduced in its entirety below: "Question on your 16750 GMT. How can it have a 1986/87 serial number when it indicates on the warranty paper that it was sold in 1982? Something up here? George" Despite the accusatory and inflammatory tone of his message, I answered him promptly and courteously, informing him that his view of the paper was simply obscured, and that the date was in fact September 29, 1987. When he continued to contact me to imply that I was mistaken, lying or otherwise up to no good, I responded that the "7" was written with a line through the middle, as is customary in many parts of the world. Still disbelieving me, he has apparently continued to post here to disparage my watch and impugn me here. After several similar messages from the original poster, I declined to engage in a discussion of hang tags with him. I think I can safely assume the original poster has no intention of purchasing my watch, only telling others what is wrong with it. So, you will have to excuse my desire not to engage in such debates further. If any of you are seriously interested in pursuing the watch and need to know what the hang tag says, i am happy to accommodate you. My longstanding record, and my feedback, speaks for itself. I do not sell fakes. I am a longtime vintage Rolex buyer and seller, and I am fairly well known in the vintage Rolex world, outside of these forums. One of my close friends purchased this watch from the original owner's son only weeks ago, and I now offer it for sale. The watch will clearly be sold this week, as it to be sold in a no-reserve auction. Thank you for your attention. Michael mdw3 Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,123
|
Quote:
I am looking for a 1983/84 vintage 16750 with the gold surround dial markers that is missing the "date" word after Oyster Perpetual on the dial. Cheers Blaine. ![]()
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.