ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 September 2010, 12:30 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
|
Second hand stuck after setting time !
My Subs only a week old and today when I corrected the time and pushed the crown in the second hand stayed motionless, pulled crown out again and back in after two attempts it kicked back into life !
Should I be concerned as it's working fine now ? Sam |
25 September 2010, 03:53 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,140
|
Outwardly it would not appear that there is anything to be concened about..
A Rolex is a mechanical watch and not a circuit board and so when you engage the gears, if they are at torque, or a pinion hasn't fully engaged, it will not work until that friction is relieved.. It is pretty common with any machinery that uses gears and torque..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
25 September 2010, 03:58 AM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
|
Quote:
Guess it's like anything mechanical needs a certain amount of bedding in. Sam |
|
29 September 2010, 08:41 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
|
Very well put, Larry!
|
12 October 2010, 05:45 AM | #5 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tylden Reed
Location: Kent UK
Watch: GMTII and more
Posts: 175
|
The only time that a balance will not re-start from the setting position is when the balance is stopped in the zero position ie when it is at its rest position (not when the hands are at zero!). Were you to have stopped the balance in any other position it would have either been wanting to return to zero or receiving an impulse from the pallets. Your re-setting and trying again would not work as the balance was still at rest! Only a shake or twist would start it. I doubt if you can replicate this. IMHO an escapement/balance never requires 'bedding-in' Regards, Tylden.
|
12 October 2010, 05:58 AM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
|
Quote:
Sam |
|
12 October 2010, 06:32 AM | #7 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tylden Reed
Location: Kent UK
Watch: GMTII and more
Posts: 175
|
I guess so. T.
|
12 October 2010, 07:05 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
|
Oh and nothing to be concerned about ?
:-) |
12 October 2010, 07:25 AM | #9 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tylden Reed
Location: Kent UK
Watch: GMTII and more
Posts: 175
|
Not unless it regularly happens! Perhaps you could have it checked at a service centre (center) to make sure it is not way off beat - like a pendulum wall clock that is not upright by several degrees! Other than that enjoy it. Tylden.
|
12 October 2010, 07:28 AM | #10 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tylden Reed
Location: Kent UK
Watch: GMTII and more
Posts: 175
|
It's late (22:28 is late for me!) so I'm off to bed so no more from me tonight. Tylden.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.