ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 May 2012, 12:10 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 27
|
Is there a big difference in the thickness..
Of the more popular panerai models (other than the very thin rad 338)?
|
9 May 2012, 12:14 PM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
Quote:
232 is thin 190 is not too thin 312 is thick 305 is a tuna can Many others in between. Basically all auto's will make it thicker Basically all high PR models will be slightly thicker as well opposed to a lower PR model. Even the caseback makes a difference. I feel my 390 is thinner than my 111. Same movement, different caseback.
__________________
member#3242 |
|
9 May 2012, 10:07 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: paul
Location: surabaya
Posts: 321
|
|
9 May 2012, 11:25 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
|
My 297 GMT is Definetely thicker
__________________
'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill |
10 May 2012, 10:05 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 27
|
Thanks... I think i am going with the 312... Good compliment to my 338.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.